Gomez v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Albert John Gomez |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 8:2022cv00275 |
| February 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Virginia M Hernandez Covington |
| Julie S Sneed |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
SCHEDULING ORDER. Plaintiff's memorandum due in 60 days; Defendant's memorandum due 60 days after service of Plaintiff's memorandum. Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed on April 1, 2022. (AKA)
|
| Filing 12 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Commissioner of Social Security. (Rudy, John) |
| Filing 11 SOCIAL security transcript of administrative proceedings re #10 Answer to Complaint by Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Appendix, #3 Appendix, #4 Appendix, #5 Appendix, #6 Appendix, #7 Appendix, #8 Appendix, #9 Appendix, #10 Appendix, #11 Appendix, #12 Appendix, #13 Appendix, #14 Appendix, #15 Appendix, #16 Appendix, #17 Appendix, #18 Appendix, #19 Appendix, #20 Appendix, #21 Appendix)(Rudy, John) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Commissioner of Social Security.(Rudy, John) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Albert John Gomez. Related case(s): No (Avard, Carol) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 7 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule by Albert John Gomez. (Avard, Carol) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.03, which requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (MEJ) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), which requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (MEJ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (MEJ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Nadine Elder on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Elder, Nadine) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Standing Order on Management of Social Security Cases, 3:21-mc-1-TJC, Doc. #43. (BD) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington and Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. New case number: 8:22-cv-0275-VMC-JSS. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLMDC-19188042) filed by Albert John Gomez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Avard, Carol) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
