Smith v. Maximus Federal Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: CORRINA SMITH
Defendant: MAXIMUS FEDERAL SERVICES, INC.
Case Number: 8:2022cv00341
Filed: February 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Charlene Edwards Honeywell
Referring Judge: Thomas G Wilson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER dismissing case, with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 4/14/2022. (BGS)
April 14, 2022 Filing 25 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by Corrina Smith. (Thompson, James)
March 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 24 60 DAY ORDER dismissing case. After that 60-day period, however, dismissal shall be with prejudice. Any pending motions are denied as moot and the Clerk is directed to terminate all deadlines and administratively close the file. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 3/24/2022. (BGS)
March 23, 2022 Filing 23 NOTICE of settlement by Maximus Federal Services, Inc. (Swiger, Lindsay)
March 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER granting #21 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Maximus Federal Services, Inc. answer or response due 3/23/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson on 3/17/2022. (ABC)
March 8, 2022 Filing 21 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Unopposed by Maximus Federal Services, Inc. (Swiger, Lindsay) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. Modified on 3/8/2022 (CTR).
March 2, 2022 Filing 20 RESPONSE in Opposition re #14 Amended MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Maximus Federal Services, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Vickers, Ross) Modified on 3/3/2022 (CTR).
February 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER granting #15 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Maximus Federal Services, Inc.'s answer or response due by 3/9/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson on 2/17/2022. (DMS)
February 17, 2022 Filing 18 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Maximus Federal Services, Inc.(Vickers, Ross) Modified on 2/17/2022 (CTR).
February 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ENDORSED ORDER denying as moot #12 Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to State Court as Plaintiff has filed an Amended Motion to Remand at Doc. 14. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 2/17/2022. (JDE)
February 17, 2022 Filing 16 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Maximus Federal Services, Inc.. Related case(s): No (Swiger, Lindsay)
February 16, 2022 Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Maximus Federal Services, Inc. (Swiger, Lindsay) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. Modified on 2/16/2022 (CTR).
February 16, 2022 Filing 14 Amended MOTION to Remand to State Court by Corrina Smith. (Thompson, James)
February 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER directing counsel for Plaintiff to supplement #12 Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand to State Court with a certification of conferral pursuant to M.D. Fla. Local Rule 3.01(g), which requires a party, before filing a civil motion, to confer with the opposing party in a good faith effort to resolve the motion and to include a certification regarding such conferral. The parties are advised that any motion filed in the future that is subject to the conferral requirement of Local Rule 3.01(g) that does not include such conferral will be denied outright. Further, the parties are reminded that purposeful evasion of a communication under this rule can result in a sanction. Plaintiff shall file the supplement on or before 2/22/2022. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 2/16/2022. (JDE)
February 16, 2022 Filing 12 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Corrina Smith. (Thompson, James)
February 15, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Corrina Smith. Related case(s): No (Thompson, James)
February 15, 2022 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 3 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule by Corrina Smith. (Thompson, James)
February 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDER regarding discovery motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson on 2/1/2021. (DMS)
February 10, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Lindsay Dennis Swiger on behalf of Maximus Federal Services, Inc. Lead Counsel: Lindsay D. Swiger. (Swiger, Lindsay) Modified on 2/11/2022 (CTR).
February 10, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by James Moten Thompson on behalf of Corrina Smith. Lead Counsel: James M. Thompson. (Thompson, James)
February 10, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Local Rule 2.02(a), which requires designation of one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action. File a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation to identify lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BD)
February 10, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Defendant's Appearance by Ross Daniel Vickers on behalf of Maximus Federal Services, Inc. (Vickers, Ross) Modified on 2/11/2022 (CTR).
February 10, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS)
February 10, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS)
February 10, 2022 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell and Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. New case number: 8:22-cv-0341-CEH-TGW. (SJB)
February 9, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, case number 2022-CA-000020 filed in State Court on 01/03/2022. Filing fee $402, receipt number AFLMDC-19218781 filed by Maximus Federal Services, Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint Exhibit A, #2 State Court Docket Sheet Exhibit B, #3 State Court Other Documents Exhibit C, #4 State Court Other Documents Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Swiger, Lindsay) Modified on 2/10/2022 to correct docket text (BD).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Maximus Federal Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CORRINA SMITH
Represented By: James Moten Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MAXIMUS FEDERAL SERVICES, INC.
Represented By: Lindsay Dennis Swiger
Represented By: Ross Daniel Vickers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?