Caine v. Online Information Services, Inc. et al
Monica Caine |
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, Online Information Services Inc., Online Information Services, Inc. and Equifax Information Services, LLC |
8:2022cv00414 |
February 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Thomas P Barber |
Sean P Flynn |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. § 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 NOTICE of settlement as to Online Information Services, Inc. by Monica Caine (Morgan, Brandon) |
Filing 20 ENDORSED ORDER: "Defendant's, Online Information Services, Inc., Second Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Complaint" (Doc. #19) is granted. Online Information Services, Inc., may file its response to the complaint on or before April 11, 2022. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 3/30/2022. (EKB) |
Filing 19 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Notice of Removal by Online Information Services, Inc.. (Fernandez, Barbara) |
Filing 18 ANSWER to Complaint by Equifax Information Services, LLC.(Joffe, Jason) |
Filing 17 ENDORSED ORDER: "Defendant's Online Information Services, Inc., Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Complaint" (Doc. #15) is granted. Online Information Services may file its response to the complaint on or before March 30, 2022. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 3/17/2022. (EKB) |
Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Online Information Services, Inc.. (Fernandez, Barbara) |
Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Notice of Removal by Online Information Services, Inc.. (Fernandez, Barbara) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of mediation conference/hearing to be held on June 14, 2022 at 1:30 PM before Gregory P. Holder. (Morgan, Brandon) |
Filing 13 ENDORSED ORDER: "Equifax Information Services LLC's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint" (Doc. #10) is granted. Equifax may file its response to the complaint on or before March 28, 2022. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 2/25/2022. (EKB) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Equifax Information Services, LLC. Related case(s): No (Joffe, Jason) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Equifax Information Services, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Equifax Inc. for Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Joffe, Jason) |
Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Joffe, Jason) |
Filing 9 FCRA/FDCPA SCHEDULING ORDER - FAST TRACK. The parties shall mediate no later than JUNE 23, 2022, 2022. The Court appoints Gregory P. Holder as mediator. On or before MARCH 9, 2022, Plaintiff's counsel shall file a notice of mediation that states the agreed date and time of mediation. If mediation results in an impasse, the Court intends to schedule this action for trial within 90-120 days from the mediation conference. See order for further details. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 2/23/2022. (SRC) |
Filing 8 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SRC) |
Filing 7 NOTICE to Counsel of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SRC) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Monica Caine. (Morgan, Brandon) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Monica Caine. Related case(s): No (Morgan, Brandon) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Brandon David Morgan on behalf of Monica Caine. Lead Counsel: Brandon Morgan. (Morgan, Brandon) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Local Rule 2.02(a), which requires designation of one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action. File a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation to identify lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BD) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Thomas P. Barber and Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn. New case number: 8:22-cv-0414-TPB-SPF. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from County Court, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Polk County, Florida, case number 2022-CC-000413-0000 filed in State Court on January 19, 2022. Filing fee $402, receipt number AFLMDC-19255158 filed by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 Exhibit B - State Court Documents, #4 Exhibit C - Notice of Consent to Removal, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Joffe, Jason) Modified on 2/22/2022 to correct docket text (BD). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.