Gonzalez-Garcia v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Sarasota)
| Diego Gonzalez-Garcia |
| Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida |
| 8:2022cv00484 |
| March 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Thomas P Barber |
| Amanda Arnold Sansone |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER: Gonzalez-Garcia's #3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel is STRICKEN for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 4/18/2022. (SRC)
|
| Filing 3 CONSTRUED MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Diego Gonzalez-Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LSS) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. |
|
Filing 2
ORDER striking #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Diego Gonzalez-Garcia for lack of jurisdiction. The Clerk is directed to 1) send Gonzalez-Garcia the forms for moving for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and for applying for the writ of habeas corpus under Section 2254 and 2) close the case. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 3/11/2022. (SRC)
|
| Filing 1 ***STRICKEN PURSUANT TO #2 ORDER*** PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Diego Gonzalez-Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (Filing Fee: Not Paid; No IFP Motion filed.)(AG) Modified on 3/15/2022 (LSS). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
