Pryce v. Professional Grounds Management, Inc. et al
| Rayan Pryce |
| Professional Grounds Management, Inc. and Tom Burke |
| 8:2022cv00492 |
| March 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| James S Moody |
| Julie S Sneed |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER: The Joint Motion to Approve FLSA Settlement and Dismiss with Prejudice (Dkt. #15) is granted. The Settlement Agreement is approved. This action is dismissed with prejudice. All pending motions are denied as moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 4/28/2022. (SMB)
|
| Filing 15 Joint MOTION for Settlement Approval of FLSA claim by Rayan Pryce. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit release, #2 Exhibit affidavit)(Hovsepian, Steven) |
|
Filing 14
ENDORSED ORDER re #13 Notice of Settlement. The parties are directed to file a Joint Motion for Approval of the FLSA Settlement within 21 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 4/14/2022. (SMB)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of settlement by Rayan Pryce (Hovsepian, Steven) |
|
Filing 12
FLSA SCHEDULING ORDER. Plaintiff shall answer the Court's interrogatories within 20 days. (See Order for additional details and instructions.) Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 3/29/2022. (SMB)
|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Tom Burke, Professional Grounds Management, Inc.(AG) |
| Filing 10 RETURN of service executed on 3/4/2022 by Rayan Pryce as to Tom Burke. (Hovsepian, Steven) Modified on 3/17/2022 to edit text (CRK). |
| Filing 9 RETURN of service executed on 3/4/2022 by Rayan Pryce as to Professional Grounds Management, Inc. (Hovsepian, Steven) Modified on 3/17/2022 to edit text (CRK). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Rayan Pryce. Related case(s): No (Hovsepian, Steven) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Rayan Pryce. (Hovsepian, Steven) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (SMB) |
|
Filing 5
ENDORSED ORDER: Counsel are relieved of the requirement to file a Case Management Report within the time prescribed in Local Rule 3.02(b). The Court will enter a scheduling order once all Defendants have filed an answer. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 3/1/2022. (SMB)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Tom Burke. (BD) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Professional Grounds Management, Inc. (BD) Modified on 3/1/2022 to correct docket text (BD). |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr and Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. New case number: 8:22-cv-0492-JSM-JSS. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tom Burke, Professional Grounds Management, Inc., a Florida for Profit Corporation with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-19287999) filed by Rayan Pryce. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons for Professional Grounds Management, Inc., #3 Proposed Summons for Tom Burke)(Hovsepian, Steven) Modified on 3/1/2022 to correct docket text (BD). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
