Weston v. Life Insurance Company of North America
| Pamela Weston |
| Life Insurance Company of North America |
| 8:2022cv00515 |
| March 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
| Julie S Sneed |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Swartwood, Gregory) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Life Insurance Company of North America. Related case(s): No (Lehner, Steven) |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 5 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule by Life Insurance Company of North America identifying Corporate Parent New York Life Insurance Company for Life Insurance Company of North America. (Lehner, Steven) |
| Filing 12 Defendant's ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint by Life Insurance Company of North America.(Lehner, Steven) |
Filing 11
ENDORSED ORDER granting Defendant's #10 Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant's time to respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint is extended to April 18, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed on April 8, 2022. (AKA)
|
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint by Life Insurance Company of North America. (Lehner, Steven) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. |
| Filing 9 RETURN of service executed on 3/18/2022 by Pamela Weston as to Life Insurance Company of North America. (Swartwood, Gregory) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Pamela Weston. (Swartwood, Gregory) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Pamela Weston. Related case(s): No (Swartwood, Gregory) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Life Insurance Company of North America. (CTR) |
| Filing 3 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Pamela Weston. (Swartwood, Gregory) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell and Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. New case number: 8:22-cv-0515-CEH-JSS. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Life Insurance Company of North America (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-19302905) filed by Pamela Weston. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - venue, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons)(Swartwood, Gregory) Modified on 3/4/2022 to correct docket text (BD). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Weston v. Life Insurance Company of North America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Pamela Weston | |
| Represented By: | Gregory D. Swartwood |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Life Insurance Company of North America | |
| Represented By: | Steven D. Lehner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
