Macon v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Brittany Macon |
Midland Credit Management, Inc. |
8:2022cv00522 |
March 4, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Sean P Flynn |
Mary S Scriven |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ENDORSED ORDER GRANTING #9 Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Stay. This action is hereby STAYED pending the Eleventh Circuit's final decision in Hunstein v. Preferred Collection & Mgmt. Servs., Inc., No. 19-14434 (11th Cir.). The Clerk is directed to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case. Within fourteen (14) days of the Eleventh Circuit's final decision in Hunstein, the Parties shall file a joint notice advising the Court as to whether the stay should be lifted. If the Parties reach a settlement, prompt notice shall be provided to the Court in accord with Local Rule 3.09. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 4/18/2022. (EOJ) Modified on 4/18/2022 (EOJ). |
Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION to Stay Pending En Banc Review by the Eleventh Circuit in Hunstein v. Preferred Collection & Management Services, Inc. by Midland Credit Management, Inc.. (Marees, II, John) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Midland Credit Management, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Encore Capital Group, Inc. for Midland Credit Management, Inc.. (Marees, II, John) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Midland Credit Management, Inc.. Related case(s): Yes (Marees, II, John) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by John Michael Marees, II on behalf of Midland Credit Management, Inc.. Lead Counsel: John M. Marees, II. (Marees, II, John) |
Filing 5 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint by Midland Credit Management, Inc..(Marees, II, John) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Local Rule 2.02(a), which requires designation of one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action. File a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation to identify lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BD) |
Filing 3 NOTICE to counsel of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (CRB) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Mary S. Scriven and Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn. New case number: 8:22-cv-0522-MSS-SPF. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from County Court, Hillsborough County, case number 22CC001998 filed in State Court on 1/12/2022. Filing fee $402, receipt number AFLMDC-19306062 filed by Midland Credit Management, Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court Summons, #2 State Court Complaint, #3 State Court Docket Sheet, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Burnette, Lauren) Modified on 3/8/2022 to correct docket text (BD). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.