Prescott v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Timber Leann Prescott
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA
Case Number: 8:2022cv00536
Filed: March 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Virginia M Hernandez Covington
Referring Judge: Julie S Sneed
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER approving consent to jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 5/6/2022. (JW)
May 6, 2022 Filing 15 SOCIAL security transcript of administrative proceedings re #12 Answer to Complaint by Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Appendix, #3 Appendix, #4 Appendix, #5 Appendix, #6 Appendix, #7 Appendix, #8 Appendix, #9 Appendix, #10 Appendix, #11 Appendix, #12 Appendix, #13 Appendix, #14 Appendix, #15 Appendix, #16 Appendix, #17 Appendix, #18 Appendix, #19 Appendix, #20 Appendix, #21 Appendix, #22 Appendix, #23 Appendix, #24 Appendix, #25 Appendix, #26 Appendix, #27 Appendix, #28 Appendix, #29 Appendix)(Rudy, John)
May 6, 2022 Filing 14 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Commissioner of Social Security. (Rudy, John)
May 6, 2022 Filing 13 CONSENT to trial by U.S. Magistrate Judge by Commissioner of Social Security. (Rudy, John)
May 6, 2022 Filing 12 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint by Commissioner of Social Security.(Rudy, John)
March 16, 2022 Filing 11 CORPORATE disclosure statement by Timber Leann Prescott re 9 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule. (Harris, Suzanne)
March 16, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Timber Leann Prescott. Related case(s): No (Harris, Suzanne)
March 15, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.03, which requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (MEJ)
March 15, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), which requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (MEJ)
March 15, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (MEJ)
March 14, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Nadine Elder on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security. (Elder, Nadine)
March 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed on March 10, 2022. (TLM)
March 8, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Standing Order on Management of Social Security Cases, 3:21-mc-1-TJC, Doc. #43. (BD)
March 8, 2022 Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington and Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. New case number: 8:22-cv-0536-VMC-JSS. Motion(s) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency . Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. (SJB)
March 8, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Timber Leann Prescott. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in support of Forma Pauperis)(Harris, Suzanne) Modified on 3/8/2022 to correct docket text (BD).
March 8, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Timber Leann Prescott. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Harris, Suzanne) Modified on 3/8/2022 to correct docket text (BD).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Prescott v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timber Leann Prescott
Represented By: Suzanne Lynn Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: John F. Rudy, III
Represented By: Nadine Elder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?