Bunting v. Progressive American Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Helen Bunting
Defendant: Progressive American Insurance Company
Case Number: 8:2022cv00541
Filed: March 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Sean P Flynn
Referring Judge: William F Jung
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 60-DAY ORDER dismissing case in accordance with the attached order. The Clerk is directed to terminate all pending motions/deadlines and close the case. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 11/28/2022. (CCB)
November 28, 2022 Filing 21 NOTICE of settlement by Helen Bunting. (Gadd, William)
August 23, 2022 Filing 20 NOTICE of Stand In-Counsel Appearance by Daniel Ari Shapiro on behalf of Progressive American Insurance Company. (Shapiro, Daniel)
August 9, 2022 Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Ari Shapiro on behalf of Progressive American Insurance Company (Shapiro, Daniel)
August 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ENDORSED ORDER granting #17 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Elisabeth Anne Fontugne terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn on 8/5/2022. (Flynn, Sean)
August 5, 2022 Filing 17 Unopposed MOTION for Elisabeth A. Fontugne to Withdraw as Attorney of record, by Progressive American Insurance Company. (Fontugne, Elisabeth) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn.
July 28, 2022 Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Ari Shapiro on behalf of Progressive American Insurance Company. (Shapiro, Daniel)
July 15, 2022 Filing 15 ANSWER and affirmative defenses with Jury Demand to #14 Amended Complaint by Progressive American Insurance Company.(Fontugne, Elisabeth)
July 1, 2022 Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Progressive American Insurance Company with Jury Demand. Filed by Helen Bunting.(LNR)
July 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ENDORSED ORDER granting #12 Motion to Amend; please file the amended complaint with exhibit as a separate document on the docket. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 7/1/2022. (Jung, William)
June 30, 2022 Filing 12 First MOTION to Amend Complaint by Helen Bunting. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Amended Complaint)(Gadd, William)
June 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Dispositive motions due by 8/30/2023. Pretrial statement due by 12/7/2023. Final Pretrial Conference set for 12/14/2023 at 09:00 AM in Tampa Courtroom 15 B before Judge William F. Jung. Jury Trial set for the JANUARY 2024 TRIAL TERM commencing on 1/2/2024 at 09:00 AM in Tampa Courtroom 15 B before Judge William F. Jung. Conduct mediation hearing by 9/27/2023. Lead counsel to coordinate dates. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 6/9/2022. (CAH)
April 5, 2022 Filing 10 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Fontugne, Elisabeth)
March 23, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Helen Bunting. Related case(s): No (Gadd, William)
March 23, 2022 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 3 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule 3.03 by Helen Bunting. (Gadd, William)
March 23, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by William John Gadd on behalf of Helen Bunting. (Gadd, William)
March 16, 2022 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 3 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule 3.03, by Progressive American Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent The Progressive Corporation, Corporate Parent Drive Insurance Holdings, Inc. for Progressive American Insurance Company. (Fontugne, Elisabeth)
March 16, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Progressive American Insurance Company. Related case(s): No (Fontugne, Elisabeth)
March 9, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (CAH)
March 9, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (CAH)
March 8, 2022 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge William F. Jung and Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn. New case number: 8:22-cv-0541-WFJ-SPF. (SJB)
March 8, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Florida Circuit Court for the Tenth Judicial Circuit, case number 2022-CA-000249 filed in State Court on 01/25/2022. Filing fee $402, receipt number AFLMDC-19316426 filed by Progressive American Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 State Court Answer, #3 State Court Docket Sheet, #4 State Court Other Documents, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Exhibit Notice of filing Notice of Removal, #7 Exhibit Registration with Florida Secretary of State, #8 Exhibit Declarations sheet, #9 Exhibit Civil Remedy Notice, #10 Exhibit MRI lumbar spine report)(Fontugne, Elisabeth) Modified on 3/9/2022 to correct docket text (BD).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bunting v. Progressive American Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Helen Bunting
Represented By: Dean Burnetti
Represented By: William John Gadd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Progressive American Insurance Company
Represented By: Elisabeth Anne Fontugne
Represented By: Daniel Ari Shapiro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?