Cosme Calderon v. United States Department of State et al
Plaintiff: Loida Ivette Cosme Calderon
Defendant: United States Department of State, United States Embassy in Amman, Jordan, Antony Blinken and Henry T. Wooster
Case Number: 8:2022cv00600
Filed: March 15, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Susan C Bucklew
Referring Judge: Christopher P Tuite
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 8, 2022 Filing 4 SUMMONS returned executed by Loida Ivette Cosme Calderon. Antony Blinken served on 3/21/2022, answer due 5/20/2022; United States Department of State served on 3/21/2022, answer due 5/20/2022; United States Embassy in Amman, Jordan served on 3/21/2022, answer due 5/20/2022; Henry T. Wooster served on 3/21/2022, answer due 5/20/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit USPS Receipts)(Schmidt, Katarina)
March 15, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Antony Blinken, United States Department of State, United States Embassy in Amman, Jordan, Henry T. Wooster, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (BD)
March 15, 2022 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Susan C. Bucklew and Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:22-cv-0600-SCB-CPT. (SJB)
March 15, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Antony Blinken, United States Embassy in Amman, Jordan, United States Department of State, Henry T. Wooster (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-19340361) filed by Loida Ivette Cosme Calderon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons DOS, #3 Proposed Summons Embassy, #4 Proposed Summons Blinken, #5 Proposed Summons Wooster, #6 Proposed Summons Att. General, #7 Proposed Summons U.S. Att.)(Schmidt, Katarina) Modified on 3/15/2022 to correct docket text (BD).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cosme Calderon v. United States Department of State et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Loida Ivette Cosme Calderon
Represented By: Katarina Schmidt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Department of State
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Embassy in Amman, Jordan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Antony Blinken
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Henry T. Wooster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?