Mayes v. Phoenix Financial Services, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Carrie Rebecca Mayes
Defendant: Phoenix Financial Services, LLC and Pendrick Capital Partners, LLC
Case Number: 8:2022cv00660
Filed: March 22, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Kathryn Kimball Mizelle
Referring Judge: Anthony E Porcelli
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ENDORSED ORDER: The Court grants the defendants' unopposed #15 motion to stay, stays this action, and directs the Clerk to administratively close the action pending the Eleventh Circuit's en banc ruling in Hunstein v. Preferred Collection & Management Services, Inc. Lead counsel is directed to provide the Court with notice as to the status of this action within one week of any decision from the Eleventh Circuit. Failure to timely notify the Court of the decision in Hunstein will result in the dismissal of this action without further notice. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 4/25/2022. (JMB)
April 22, 2022 Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION to Stay by Pendrick Capital Partners, LLC, Phoenix Financial Services, LLC. (Schuette, Michael)
April 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by July 29, 2022. Dispositive motions due by September 1, 2022. Pretrial Conference scheduled for December 8, 2022 at 1:30 PM in Tampa Courtroom 13B before Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle. Jury Trial scheduled for the January 2023 trial calendar in Tampa Courtroom 13B before Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle. Conduct mediation by August 12, 2022. Lead counsel to coordinate dates. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 4/13/2022. (GSO)
April 12, 2022 Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Carrie Rebecca Mayes. (Bonan, Thomas)
April 12, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Carrie Rebecca Mayes. Related case(s): No (Bonan, Thomas)
April 12, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Thomas Martin Bonan on behalf of Carrie Rebecca Mayes. Lead Counsel: Thomas M. Bonan. (Bonan, Thomas)
March 28, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Pendrick Capital Partners, LLC, Phoenix Financial Services, LLC. Related case(s): No (Schuette, Michael)
March 28, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Michael Schuette on behalf of Pendrick Capital Partners, LLC, Phoenix Financial Services, LLC. Lead Counsel: Michael P. Schuette. (Schuette, Michael)
March 28, 2022 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Order pdf by Pendrick Capital Partners, LLC. (Schuette, Michael)
March 28, 2022 Filing 7 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint by Pendrick Capital Partners, LLC.(Schuette, Michael)
March 28, 2022 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Order pdf by Phoenix Financial Services, LLC. (Schuette, Michael)
March 28, 2022 Filing 5 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint by Phoenix Financial Services, LLC.(Schuette, Michael)
March 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CIVIL CASE ORDER. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 3/23/2022. (JMB)
March 22, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Local Rule 2.02(a), which requires designation of one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action. File a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation to identify lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BD)
March 22, 2022 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:22-cv-0660-KKM-AEP. (SJB)
March 22, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Sixth Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County, Florida, case number 22-001439-SC filed in State Court on 02/15/2021. Filing fee $402, receipt number AFLMDC-19368070 filed by Pendrick Capital Partners, LLC, Phoenix Financial Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Schuette, Michael) Modified on 3/22/2022 to correct docket text (BD).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mayes v. Phoenix Financial Services, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carrie Rebecca Mayes
Represented By: Thomas Martin Bonan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Phoenix Financial Services, LLC
Represented By: Dayle Marie Van Hoose
Represented By: Michael Schuette
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pendrick Capital Partners, LLC
Represented By: Dayle Marie Van Hoose
Represented By: Michael Schuette
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?