Collins v. Krushimi Two, LLC
Plaintiff: April Collins
Defendant: KRUSHIMI TWO LLC and Krushimi Two, LLC doing business as Hungry Howie's Pizza
Case Number: 8:2022cv00776
Filed: April 1, 2022
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Charlene Edwards Honeywell
Referring Judge: Anthony E Porcelli
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 60 DAY ORDER dismissing case. This case be administratively closed pending receipt, within sixty (60) days from the date of this Order, of either a Joint Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, or a Joint Motion to Approve Proposed FLSA Settlement. If the claims were resolved without compromise, a joint motion to approve FLSA settlement is unnecessary. In its place, the parties are directed to file a notice of dismissal indicating that the claims have been resolved without compromise. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 5/18/2022. (BGS)
May 17, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of settlement by Krushimi Two, LLC (Johnson, Kevin)
May 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ENDORSED ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant's response is due on or before May 17, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli on 5/4/2022. (BMM)
May 4, 2022 Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by April Collins. (Printy, Gary)
May 4, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by April Collins. Related case(s): No (Printy, Gary)
May 3, 2022 Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Krushimi Two, LLC. (Johnson, Kevin) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli.
April 19, 2022 Filing 6 RETURN of service executed on 4/12/2022 by April Collins as to Krushimi Two, LLC. (Printy, Gary) Modified text on 4/20/2022 (MCB).
April 4, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS issued as to Krushimi Two, LLC. (BD)
April 4, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS)
April 4, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS)
April 1, 2022 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:22-cv-0776-CEH-AEP. (SJB)
April 1, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Krushimi Two, LLC with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-19413043) filed by April Collins. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Printy, Gary) Modified on 4/4/2022 to correct docket text (BD).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Collins v. Krushimi Two, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: April Collins
Represented By: Gary L. Printy, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KRUSHIMI TWO LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Krushimi Two, LLC doing business as Hungry Howie's Pizza
Represented By: Kevin D. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?