Eley v. DeSantis et al
Christopher Eley, Ron DeSantis, Bob Gualtieri, Corinna Branley, Joseph Wodraska, John Does, Pinellas County S.P.O.T. Unit, Tampa Police Department, Pinellas County Public Defender's Office, Hillsborough County Public Defender's Office, Bernie McCabe, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Christie Pardo and Brian Pingor |
8:2022cv00851 |
April 8, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Kathryn Kimball Mizelle |
Julie S Sneed |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER: The #1 complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the filing of a new complaint, in a new case, with a new case number, upon payment of the $402.00 filing fee. The #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is DENIED AS MOOT. The CLERK is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 4/18/2022. (MLH) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Christopher Eley. (Attachments: #1 Explanation, #2 Mailing Envelope)(SEG) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Corinna Branley, Ron Desantis, Bob Gualtieri, Joseph Wodraska with Jury Demand filed by Christopher Eley. (Attachments: #1 Detailed account of Complaint, #2 Mailing Envelope)(SEG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.