Rocha Gonzalez v. Mayorkas et al
Plaintiff: Juan Rocha Gonzalez
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas and Ur M. Jaddou
Case Number: 8:2022cv00881
Filed: April 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Thomas P Barber
Referring Judge: Anthony E Porcelli
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ENDORSED ORDER: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) and Plaintiff's "Notice of Voluntary Dismissal" (Doc. #11), this case is dismissed. The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and deadlines, and thereafter close this case. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 5/16/2022. (ANL)
May 16, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of voluntary dismissal by Juan Rocha Gonzalez (Stoller, David)
May 13, 2022 Filing 10 SUMMONS returned executed by Juan Rocha Gonzalez. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit proof of service)(Stoller, David)
May 13, 2022 Filing 9 PROOF of SERVICE by Juan Rocha Gonzalez as to Alejandro Mayorkas served on 4/25/2022, answer due 6/24/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Summons Executed)(Stoller, David) Modified text on 5/16/2022 (LSS).
May 13, 2022 Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE by Juan Rocha Gonzalez as to Ur M. Jaddou served on 4/25/2022, answer due 6/24/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Summons Executed)(Stoller, David) Modified text on 5/16/2022 (LSS).
April 26, 2022 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 4 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule by Juan Rocha Gonzalez. (Stoller, David)
April 26, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Juan Rocha Gonzalez. Related case(s): Yes (Stoller, David)
April 21, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SRC)
April 21, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE to Counsel of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SRC)
April 14, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas. (BD)
April 14, 2022 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Thomas P. Barber and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:22-cv-0881-TPB-AEP. (SJB)
April 14, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-19460268) filed by Juan Rocha Gonzalez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Exhibit I-130 Receipt, #5 Exhibit Web Portal information re I-130, #6 Exhibit Published Processing Report, #7 Exhibit USCIS Information Sheet discussing how to read agency Processing Reports)(Stoller, David) Modified on 4/14/2022 to correct docket text (BD).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rocha Gonzalez v. Mayorkas et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Juan Rocha Gonzalez
Represented By: David Stoller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ur M. Jaddou
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?