Wiles v. Jordan Nicholas Elliott, Inc.
| Matthew Wiles |
| Jordan Nicholas Elliott, Inc. |
| 8:2022cv00932 |
| April 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
| Christopher P Tuite |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER dismissing case, without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and deadlines and CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 5/9/2022. (BGS)
|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION of Dismissal (Jointly filed) - without Prejudice by Matthew Wiles. (Leach, Carlos) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 5 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule by Matthew Wiles. (Leach, Carlos) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Matthew Wiles. Related case(s): No (Leach, Carlos) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: 1. Wiles's complaint #1 is DISMISSED without prejudice as a shotgun pleading. 2. The Court grants Wiles leave to file an amended complaint within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS from the date of this order, which must correct the deficiencies discussed herein. 3. Failure to file an amended complaint within the time provided will result in the dismissal of this action, without prejudice, without further notice. See order for details. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 4/25/2022. (GLP)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to counsels Josh Sanford and Sean Short of Local Rule 2.01(c), Special Admission of Non-Resident Lawyer - File a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Co-counsel with filing rights may electronically file the motion on behalf of the non-resident lawyer or the motion may be filed on paper; Pay the Special Admission Fee; (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BD) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Jordan Nicholas Elliott, Inc. (BD) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell and Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:22-cv-0932-CEH-CPT. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jordan Nicholas Elliott, Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-19485154) filed by Matthew Wiles. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Demand Letter, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons to be Issued)(Leach, Carlos) Modified on 4/21/2022 to correct docket text (BD). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wiles v. Jordan Nicholas Elliott, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Matthew Wiles | |
| Represented By: | Carlos V. Leach |
| Represented By: | Josh Sanford |
| Represented By: | Sean Short |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jordan Nicholas Elliott, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
