Osorio v. IEC US Holdings, Inc.
Leonardo Osorio |
IEC US Holdings, Inc. doing business as Florida Career College |
8:2022cv01076 |
May 9, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Kathryn Kimball Mizelle |
Christopher P Tuite |
Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) |
47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ENDORSED ORDER: Plaintiff has filed a #15 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with prejudice to his individual claims and without prejudice as to the putative class claims. Because no defendant has filed an answer or motion for summary judgment, this notice is self-executing. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i); Matthews v. Gaither, 902 F.2d 877, 880 (11th Cir. 1990) ("The dismissal [under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i)] is effective immediately upon the filing of a written notice of dismissal, and no subsequent court order is required."). The Clerk is directed to terminate any deadlines and pending motions and to close this case. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 6/16/2022. (SMR) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of voluntary dismissal by Leonardo Osorio (Simil, Jennifer) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Leonardo Osorio. Related case(s): No (Patti, Thomas) |
Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Leonardo Osorio. (Patti, Thomas) |
Filing 12 ENDORSED ORDER granting #10 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond. Defendant must respond no later than June 17, 2022. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 5/23/2022. (SMR) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #7 Civil Action Order by IEC US Holdings, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate IEC Corporation for IEC US Holdings, Inc. (Kemp-Gerstel, Andrew) Modified text on 5/23/2022 (AG). |
Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to #1 Complaint by IEC US Holdings, Inc. (Starks, Michael) Modified text on 5/23/2022 (AG). |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael D. Starks on behalf of IEC US Holdings, Inc. (Starks, Michael) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Kemp-Gerstel on behalf of IEC US Holdings, Inc. (Kemp-Gerstel, Andrew) |
Filing 7 CIVIL CASE ORDER. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 5/13/2022. (SMR) |
Filing 6 RETURN of service executed on 5/11/2022 by Leonardo Osorio as to IEC US Holdings, Inc. (Hiraldo, Manuel) Modified text on 5/12/2022 (AG). |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Manuel Santiago Hiraldo on behalf of Leonardo Osorio. Lead Counsel: Manuel S. Hiraldo. (Hiraldo, Manuel) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Local Rule 2.02(a), which requires designation of one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action. File a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation to identify lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BD) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to IEC US Holdings, Inc. (BD) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle and Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:22-cv-1076-KKM-CPT. (NAS) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against IEC US Holdings, Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-19548009) filed by Leonardo Osorio. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Hiraldo, Manuel) Modified on 5/10/2022 to correct docket text (BD). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.