Mack v. Curtis et al
| Sean Michael Mack |
| Mark Andrew Curtis and Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company |
| 8:2022cv01484 |
| June 28, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Thomas P Barber |
| Julie S Sneed |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 ***STRICKEN-IMAGE REMOVED AS DISCOVERY***NOTICE by Sean Michael Mack of Taking Deposition of Mark Andrew Curtis (Joyce, Robert) (LSS). Modified on 8/18/2022 (LSS). |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF RESCHEDULING HEARING: The Initial Case Management Conference hearing previously scheduled for 8/24/2022 is rescheduled. New scheduling date and time: SEPTEMBER 14, 2022, at 09:30 AM in Tampa Courtroom 14 A before Judge Thomas P. Barber. (SRC) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE by Sean Michael Mack re 14 Notice of hearing Notice of Conflict and Request To Reschedule Initial Case Management Conference (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Joyce, Robert) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE by Sean Michael Mack re 14 Notice of hearing Notice of Conflict and Request To Reschedule Initial Case Management Conference (Joyce, Robert) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of hearing: Initial Case Management Conference set for AUGUST 24, 2022, at 09:30 AM in Tampa Courtroom 14 A before Judge Thomas P. Barber. (SRC) |
| Filing 13 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Joyce, Robert) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Sean Michael Mack. (Joyce, Robert) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of a related action Yes per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Sean Michael Mack. Related case(s): Yes (Joyce, Robert) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of a related action yes per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company. Related case(s): Yes (Pate, Christopher) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company. Related case(s): Yes (Pate, Christopher) Modified on 7/11/2022 (BES). |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company identifying Other Affiliate Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company for Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company. (Pate, Christopher) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Mark Andrew Curtis. (Amos, Kenneth) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Mark Andrew Curtis. Related case(s): Yes (Amos, Kenneth) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Aaron Pate on behalf of Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Pate, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SRC) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Counsel of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SRC) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Thomas P. Barber and Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. New case number: 8:22-cv-1484-TPB-JSS. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hillsborough County Circuit Court, case number 22-CA-004492 filed in State Court on 05/27/22. Filing fee $402, receipt number AFLMDC-19718485 filed by Mark Andrew Curtis. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B - Affidavit of Service, #3 Exhibit C - Traffic Crash Report, #4 Exhibit D - Florida Sunbiz Entity Listing, #5 Exhibit E - Policy Declarations Page, #6 Exhibit F - Plaintiff's Demand, #7 Exhibit G - Consent to Removal, #8 State Court Other Documents Exhibit H - All State Court Documents, #9 Civil Cover Sheet, #10 State Court Docket Sheet, #11 State Court ANSWER)(Amos, Kenneth) Modified text on 6/29/2022 (SEG). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
