GPZ Services, Inc. v. Research Laboratory Supply, Inc. et al
| GPZ Services, Inc. |
| RESEARCH LABORATORY SUPPLY, INC., GREGORY BLACKLEDGE and Research Laboratory Supply, Inc. a Florida Corporation doing business as Med Lab Supply |
| 8:2022cv01648 |
| July 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Steven D Merryday |
| Amanda Arnold Sansone |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Defendants' ANSWER and affirmative defenses with Jury Demand to #10 Amended Complaint, by Gregory Blackledge, Research Laboratory Supply, Inc.(Lever, Daniel) Modified on 9/8/2022 (CTR). |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel R. Lever on behalf of Gregory Blackledge, Research Laboratory Supply, Inc. (Lever, Daniel) |
| Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT to include Exhibits against Gregory Blackledge, Research Laboratory Supply, Inc. with Jury Demand. filed by GPZ Services, Inc. Related document: #9 Amended Complaint, filed by GPZ Services, Inc., #1 Complaint, filed by GPZ Services, Inc..(Weissman, Joseph) Modified on 8/24/2022 (CTR). |
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Gregory Blackledge, Research Laboratory Supply, Inc. with Jury Demand. filed by GPZ Services, Inc. Related document: #1 Complaint, filed by GPZ Services, Inc.(Weissman, Joseph) Modified on 8/24/2022 (CTR). |
| Filing 8 PROOF of service by GPZ Services, Inc. (Weissman, Joseph) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED/PROOF of service by GPZ Services, Inc. (Weissman, Joseph) Modified on 8/9/2022 (CTR). |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by GPZ Services, Inc. Related case(s): No (Weissman, Joseph) Modified on 7/22/2022 (CTR). |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS issued as to Gregory Blackledge, Research Laboratory Supply, Inc. (SEG) |
| Filing 4 Trademark Report sent to Alexandria, VA. (SEG) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c) and Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (DAY) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Steven D. Merryday and Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. New case number: 8:22-cv-1648-SDM-AAS. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-19794712) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Proposed Summons Research Laboratory Supply, Inc., #5 Proposed Summons Gregory Blackledge)(Weissman, Joseph) Modified text on 7/21/2022 (SEG). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
