Auctus Group, LLC v. 216 Constellation LLC et al
| Auctus Group, LLC |
| 216 Constellation LLC and Matthew Chase Bryant |
| 8:2022cv01689 |
| July 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Kathryn Kimball Mizelle |
| Amanda Arnold Sansone |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to 216 Constellation LLC, Matthew Chase Bryant (SET) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Clerk's Default against 216 Constellation LLC, Matthew Chase Bryant by Auctus Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support of Motion for Clerk's Default, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default)(Johnson-Sardella, Jenny) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. |
| Filing 13 RETURN of service executed on August 19, 2022 by Auctus Group, LLC as to 216 Constellation LLC. (Johnson-Sardella, Jenny) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 9 Order no pdf, filed by Auctus Group, LLC. (Johnson-Sardella, Jenny) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 9 Order no pdf, #7 Standing Order, by Auctus Group, LLC. (Johnson-Sardella, Jenny) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Auctus Group, LLC. Related case(s): No (Johnson-Sardella, Jenny) |
Filing 9
ENDORSED ORDER: A July 29, 2022 order (Doc. #7) directs the plaintiff to file a disclosure statement and a notice of related action no later than August 12, 2022. The plaintiff fails to comply. No later than August 22, 2022, the plaintiff must file a disclosure statement and a notice of related action, show good cause for the failure to file, or become subject to dismissal without further notice. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 8/15/2022. (JMP)
|
| Filing 8 RETURN of service executed on August 3, 2022 by Auctus Group, LLC as to Matthew Chase Bryant. (Johnson-Sardella, Jenny) |
|
Filing 7
CIVIL CASE ORDER. Counsel and any unrepresented party shall meet within forty days after any defendant appears for the purposes of preparing and filing a Case Management Report. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 7/29/2022. (SMR)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Mark David Hunter on behalf of Auctus Group, LLC. Lead Counsel: Mark David Hunter. (Hunter, Mark) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS issued as to 216 Constellation LLC, Matthew Chase Bryant. (SET) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to counsel of Local Rule 2.02(a), which requires designation of one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action. File a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation to identify lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SET) |
| Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle and Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. New case number: 8:22-cv-1689-KKM-AAS. (SJB) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jenny Daphne Johnson-Sardella on behalf of Auctus Group, LLC (Johnson-Sardella, Jenny) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 216 Constellation LLC, Matthew Chase Bryant with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-19818502) filed by Auctus Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons)(Hunter, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
