Clouser v. Verizon Wireless Services, LLC et al
| Ashley Clouser |
| Verizon Wireless Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Trans Union, LLC and Equifax Information Services, LLC |
| 8:2022cv01764 |
| August 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
| Julie S Sneed |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 34
ENDORSED ORDER granting #33 Defendant Verizon Wireless Services' Unopposed Motion for Extension to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant's response to #1 the Complaint is due on or before October 10, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed on 9/30/2022. (SMC)
|
| Filing 33 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading to the Plaintiff's Complaint (DE 1) by Verizon Wireless Services, LLC. (Golden, John) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. |
| Filing 32 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.(Hogan, Michelle) Modified text on 9/20/2022 (MCB). |
|
Filing 31
ORDER: Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC, only, are dismissed, with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. The Clerk is directed to terminate Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC, as a party to this case. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 9/14/2022. (BGS)
|
| Filing 30 NOTICE of voluntary dismissal by Ashley Clouser (Dubbeld, Jon) |
| Filing 29 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Verizon Wireless Services, LLC. Related case(s): Yes (Golden, John) |
|
Filing 28
ENDORSED ORDER granting #22 Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC's time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to September 21, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed on August 31, 2022. (DD)
|
| Filing 27 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Trans Union, LLC. Related case(s): Yes (Epps, Alexandria) |
| Filing 26 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 3 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule, by Trans Union, LLC identifying Corporate Parent TransUnion, Corporate Parent TransUnion Intermediate Holdings, Inc., Other Affiliate T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. for Trans Union, LLC. (Epps, Alexandria) |
| Filing 25 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Trans Union, LLC.(Epps, Alexandria) |
| Filing 24 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Equifax Information Services, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Equifax, Inc. for Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Joffe, Jason) |
| Filing 23 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Equifax Information Services, LLC. Related case(s): No (Joffe, Jason) |
| Filing 22 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Joffe, Jason) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance by Armando Pedro Rubio on behalf of Verizon Wireless Services, LLC (Rubio, Armando) |
| Filing 20 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 3 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule, by Verizon Wireless Services, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Verizon Wireless Services, LLC, Corporate Parent MCI Communications Services, Inc., Corporate Parent Verizon Communications Inc., Corporate Parent Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems LLC, Corporate Parent Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Corporate Parent GTE LLC, Corporate Parent NYNEX LLC, Corporate Parent GTE Wireless of the Midwest Incorporated, Corporate Parent GTE Wireless Services LLC, Corporate Parent Verizon Americas Inc. for Verizon Wireless Services, LLC. (Golden, John) |
|
Filing 19
ENDORSED ORDER granting #18 Defendant Verizon Wireless Services, LLC's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading. Defendant Verizon Wireless Services, LLC's time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to September 30, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed on August 29, 2022. (DD)
|
| Filing 18 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, by Verizon Wireless Services, LLC. (Golden, John) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by John Patrick Golden on behalf of Verizon Wireless Services, LLC (Golden, John) |
|
Filing 16
ENDORSED ORDER granting #15 Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.'s time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to September 20, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed on August 26, 2022. (DD)
|
| Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (Hogan, Michelle) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. Modified text on 8/23/2022 (MCB). |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Related case(s): No (Hogan, Michelle) Modified text on 8/23/2022 (MCB). |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 3 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule, by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Experian plc, Other Affiliate Central Source LLC, Other Affiliate Online Data Exchange LLC, Other Affiliate New Management Services LLC, Other Affiliate VantageScore Solutions LLC, Other Affiliate Opt-Out Services LLC for Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (Hogan, Michelle) Modified text on 8/23/2022 (MCB). |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Michelle Hogan on behalf of Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (Hogan, Michelle) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Ashley Clouser. Related case(s): No (Dubbeld, Jon) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Ashley Clouser. (Dubbeld, Jon) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Jon Paul Dubbeld on behalf of Ashley Clouser. Lead Counsel: Jon P. Dubbeld. (Dubbeld, Jon) |
| Filing 8 RETURN of service executed on 08.09.22 by Ashley Clouser as to Verizon Wireless Services, LLC. (Dubbeld, Jon) |
| Filing 7 RETURN of service executed on 08.09.22 by Ashley Clouser as to Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (Dubbeld, Jon) Modified text on 8/16/2022 (MCB). |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS issued as to Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Trans Union, LLC, Verizon Wireless Services, LLC. (SET) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE to counsel of Local Rule 2.02(a), which requires designation of one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action. File a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation to identify lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SET) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell and Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. New case number: 8:22-cv-1764-CEH-JSS. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-19849235) filed by Ashley Clouser. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons)(Dubbeld, Jon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
