Cohen v. Commissioner of Social Security
Martin Cohen |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA |
8:2022cv01858 |
August 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Steven D Merryday |
Thomas G Wilson |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Commissioner of Social Security answer or response due 12/13/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson on 10/13/2022. (Wilson, Thomas) |
Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Commissioner of Social Security. (Rudy, John) |
Filing 5 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Martin Cohen. (Cohen, Martin) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Martin Cohen. Related case(s): No (Cohen, Martin) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Nadine Elder on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Elder, Nadine) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Steven D. Merryday and Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. New case number: 8:22-cv-1858-SDM-TGW. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Writ of Mandamus against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-19883517) filed by Martin Cohen. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D)(Cohen, Martin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.