Docobo et al v. Ace Insurance Company of the Midwest
| Angel J. Docobo and Lucelia A. Docobo |
| Ace Insurance Company of the Midwest |
| 8:2022cv01868 |
| August 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Steven D Merryday |
| Christopher P Tuite |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in opposition re #8 Motion to Remand to State Court filed by Ace Insurance Company of the Midwest. (Payne, Tahirah) |
| Filing 8 First MOTION to Remand to State Court and Supporting Memorandum of Law by All Plaintiffs. (Harris, Jamie) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Ace Insurance Company of the Midwest identifying Corporate Parent Chubb Limited, Other Affiliate INA Holdings Corporation, Other Affiliate INA Corporation, Other Affiliate INA Financial Corporation, Other Affiliate Chubb Group Holdings Inc., Other Affiliate Chubb INA Holdings Inc., Other Affiliate ACE Property and Casualty Insurance Company for Ace Insurance Company of the Midwest. (Payne, Tahirah) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Ace Insurance Company of the Midwest. Related case(s): No (Payne, Tahirah) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c) and Local Rule 3.02(a)(2). -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (DAY) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Tahirah Rashida Payne on behalf of Ace Insurance Company of the Midwest. Lead Counsel: Brian P. Henry. (Payne, Tahirah) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to counsel Tahirah R. Payne, Brian P. Henry of Local Rule 2.02(a), which requires designation of one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action. File a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation to identify lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SET) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Steven D. Merryday and Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:22-cv-1868-SDM-CPT. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Hillsborough County, case number 2022-CA-005355 filed in State Court on 06/24/2022. Filing fee $402, receipt number AFLMDC-19888082 filed by Ace Insurance Company of the Midwest. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A NTC of Intent, #2 State Court COMPLAINT , #3 Exhibit C Secretary of State, #4 Exhibit Appraisal, #5 State Court ANSWER, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 State Court Docket Sheet, #8 State Court Other Documents Complete Index)(Payne, Tahirah) Modified text on 8/17/2022 (SET). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
