Vincent-DiGiorgio v. Equifax Information Services, LLC
| Steven Vincent-DiGiorgio |
| Equifax Information Services LLC, Equifax Information Services, LLC, Truist Bank and Trans Union, LLC |
| 8:2022cv01870 |
| August 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sean P Flynn |
| Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER: 1) Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Truist Bank and Equifax Information Services, LLC, only, are dismissed, with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. 2) The Clerk is directed to terminate Defendants Truist Bank and Equifax Information Services, LLC as parties to this case. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 9/19/2022. (BGS)
|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION of Dismissal - Joint as to Defendants Truist and Equifax by Steven Vincent-DiGiorgio. (Bellinder, Thomas) |
|
Filing 15
ENDORSED ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Equifax Information Services, LLC shall answer or otherwise respond by 9/22/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn on 8/23/2022. (Flynn, Sean)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Equifax Information Services, LLC. Related case(s): No (Joffe, Jason) |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Equifax Information Services, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Equifax Inc. for Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Joffe, Jason) |
| Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Joffe, Jason) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn. |
| Filing 11 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint by Truist Bank.(Perkins, Jenny) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 3 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule, by Truist Bank identifying Corporate Parent Truist Financial Corporation for Truist Bank. (Perkins, Jenny) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Truist Bank. Related case(s): No (Perkins, Jenny) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Jenny Nicole Perkins on behalf of Truist Bank. Lead Counsel: Jenny N. Perkins. (Perkins, Jenny) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Jenny Nicole Perkins on behalf of Truist Bank (Perkins, Jenny) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 3 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule, by Steven Vincent-DiGiorgio. (Bellinder, Thomas) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Steven Vincent-DiGiorgio. Related case(s): No (Bellinder, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell and Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn. New case number: 8:22-cv-1870-CEH-SPF. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from County Court, Twelfth Judicial Circuit, Sarasota County, Florida, case number 2022-CC-004125 NC filed in State Court on July 25, 2022. Filing fee $402, receipt number AFLMDC-19888752 filed by Equifax Information Services LLC. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 Exhibit B - State Court Documents, #4 Exhibit C - Notice of Consent to Removal of Truist Bank, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Joffe, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
