United States of America v. Approximately $41,805.00 in United States Currency and Assorted Jewelry
| United States of America |
| Approximately $41,805.00 in United States Currency and Assorted Jewelry |
| 8:2022cv01883 |
| August 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Thomas P Barber |
| Christopher P Tuite |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 CLAIM Verified Judicial Claim of Claimant Garza by Approximately $41,805.00 in United States Currency and Assorted Jewelry. (Sammis, Leslie) |
| Filing 13 CLAIM Verified Judicial Claim of Claimant Guzman by Approximately $41,805.00 in United States Currency and Assorted Jewelry. (Sammis, Leslie) |
| Filing 12 PROOF of service by United States of America, PROOF of publication filed by United States of America. Newspaper: Official Government Internet Site (www.forfeiture.gov) Date(s) of publication 30 consecutive days from August 18, 2022 through September 16, 2022. (Muench, James) |
| Filing 11 US Marshal 285 form for Execution of Warrant of Arrest. (KME) |
| Filing 10 US Marshal 285 form for Execution of Warrant of Arrest. (KME) |
| Filing 8 (ENTERED IN INCORRECT CASE)(SRC) Modified on 8/25/2022 (SRC). |
| Filing 7 ENTERED IN INCORRECT CASE (SRC) Modified on 8/26/2022 (SRC). |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Issuance of Warrant In Rem. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite on 8/19/2022. (WFM)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Issuance of Warrant In Rem by United States of America. (Muench, James) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by United States of America. (Muench, James) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by United States of America. Related case(s): No (Muench, James) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Thomas P. Barber and Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:22-cv-1883-TPB-CPT. (MLJ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Forfeiture In Rem against Approximately $41,805.00 in United States Currency and Assorted Jewelry filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Muench, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Approximately $41,805.00 in United States Currency and Assorted Jewelry | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | James A. Muench |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Approximately $41,805.00 in United States Currency and Assorted Jewelry | |
| Represented By: | Leslie Miller Sammis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
