Douse v. Traeger et al
Plaintiff: James Nathaniel Douse
Defendant: Sabrina Traeger and Canoe Creek Neighborhood Association, Inc.
Case Number: 8:2022cv02098
Filed: September 13, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Thomas P Barber
Referring Judge: Julie S Sneed
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Accommodations
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ENDORSED ORDER: Plaintiff's motion to reopen and/or for reconsideration (Doc. #20) is denied. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 11/4/2022. (ANL)
November 3, 2022 Filing 20 MOTION to Reopen Case, MOTION for Reconsideration re 19 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, #14 Order dismissing case, by James Nathaniel Douse. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(LSS)
October 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ENDORSED ORDER: Plaintiff's "Motion for the Court to Give Plaintiff Access to CM/ECF System" (Doc. #17) is denied. The motion fails to demonstrate good cause or extenuating circumstances justifying the requested relief. See Postell v. Nestle Prepared Foods Co. USA, 2019 WL 5102552, at *1-2 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 25, 2019). Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 10/21/2022. (ANL)
October 20, 2022 Filing 18 RESPONSE to Motion re #8 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by James Nathaniel Douse. (AM)
October 20, 2022 Filing 17 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically Access to CM\ECF System by James Nathaniel Douse. (AM)
October 20, 2022 Filing 16 NOTICE TO THE COURT Regarding Plaintiff's Consent to Resume Case with Magistrate Judge by James Nathaniel Douse. (AM)
October 20, 2022 Filing 15 RETURN of service executed on 10/03/22 by James Nathaniel Douse as to Sabrina Traeger. (AM)
October 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER: Plaintiff's complaint (Doc. #1) is dismissed, without leave to amend, for lack of jurisdiction. Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. #8) is denied as moot. The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and deadlines and thereafter close this case. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 10/20/2022. (ANL)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ENDORSED ORDER: Plaintiff's "Motion for Defendant to Submit All Relevant Documents on the Dockets [...]" is denied. Plaintiff does not identify any documents he believes should be filed. In any event, not all documents belong on the Court's docket, such as general discovery. To the extent Plaintiff does not wish to receive any mail, Defendants may be required to serve certain documents on Plaintiff, making this request overly broad and inappropriate. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 10/18/2022. (ANL)
October 12, 2022 Filing 12 PROOF of service by James Nathaniel Douse (Incorrect Affidavit of service attached. Contacted Plaintiff.) (LSS)
October 12, 2022 Filing 11 RETURN of service executed on 9/15/2022 by James Nathaniel Douse as to Canoe Creek Neighborhood Association, Inc. (LSS)
October 12, 2022 Filing 10 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically to submit documents by James Nathaniel Douse. (LSS)
October 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ENDORSED ORDER directing Defendants to supplement #7 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Matthew E. Vogler with additional information in accordance with Middle District of Florida Local Rule 2.01(c) within 14 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed on October 11, 2022. (DD)
October 6, 2022 Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Meyer, David)
October 6, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION for Matthew E. Vogler to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. AFLMDC-20066169 for $150 by All Defendants. (Meyer, David) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed.
October 6, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by David C. Meyer on behalf of Canoe Creek Neighborhood Association, Inc., Sabrina Traeger (Meyer, David)
September 23, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SRC)
September 23, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE to Counsel of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SRC)
September 13, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Canoe Creek Neighborhood Association, Inc. (KME)
September 13, 2022 Filing 2 SUMMONS issued as to Sabrina Traeger. (KME)
September 13, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Canoe Creek Neighborhood Association, Inc., Sabrina Traeger Filing fee $402.00, receipt number TPA067216 filed by James Nathaniel Douse. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(KME)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Douse v. Traeger et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Nathaniel Douse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sabrina Traeger
Represented By: David C. Meyer
Represented By: Matthew Vogler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Canoe Creek Neighborhood Association, Inc.
Represented By: David C. Meyer
Represented By: Matthew Vogler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?