Della Rocco v. Bay Area Youth Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: KRYSTAL C DELLA ROCCO and Krystal C. Della Rocco
Defendant: Bay Area Youth Services, Inc.
Case Number: 8:2022cv02140
Filed: September 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Charlene Edwards Honeywell
Referring Judge: Thomas G Wilson
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 18, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE by Bay Area Youth Services, Inc. of Pendency of Other Actions (Hewitt, Scott)
October 18, 2022 Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Bay Area Youth Services, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Bay Area Youth Services, Inc. for Bay Area Youth Services, Inc.. (Hewitt, Scott)
October 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 FLSA SCHEDULING ORDER: By 11/3/2022 parties shall serve copies upon each other as stated in the order; By 12/22/2022 parties are to meet and confer; Answer to court interrogatories due by 11/24/2022 Settlement Report due by 1/11/2023. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 10/13/2022. (BGS)
October 12, 2022 Filing 9 BAY AREA YOUTH SERVICES, INC. ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint, by Bay Area Youth Services, Inc. (Hewitt, Scott) Modified on 10/12/2022 (CTR).
September 16, 2022 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 3 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule, is filed by Krystal C. Della Rocco. (Malatesta, Frank)
September 16, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of a related action is filed per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Krystal C. Della Rocco. Related case(s): No (Malatesta, Frank)
September 15, 2022 Filing 6 SUMMONS issued as to Bay Area Youth Services, Inc. (CTR)
September 15, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS)
September 15, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS)
September 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING ORDER regarding discovery motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson on 9/14/2022. (ABC)
September 14, 2022 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell and Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. New case number: 8:22-cv-2140-CEH-TGW. (SJB)
September 14, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bay Area Youth Services, Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-19996365) filed by KRYSTAL C DELLA ROCCO. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Malatesta, Frank)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Della Rocco v. Bay Area Youth Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KRYSTAL C DELLA ROCCO
Represented By: Frank Michael Malatesta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Krystal C. Della Rocco
Represented By: Frank Michael Malatesta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bay Area Youth Services, Inc.
Represented By: Scott Kenneth Hewitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?