Smith v. ZEP, Inc.
Anthony Smith |
ZEP, Inc. |
8:2022cv02150 |
September 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Virginia M Hernandez Covington |
Amanda Arnold Sansone |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE filed by Anthony Smith. (Lopardo, Che) |
Filing 10 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Lopardo, Che) |
Filing 9 ENDORSED ORDER: On October 17, 2022, the Court directed the parties to meet and confer, in person or by telephone, and by October 31, 2022, file a completed Case Management Report. That date has passed, yet no Case Management Report has been filed. Accordingly, Plaintiff is directed to show cause by November 9, 2022, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Local Rule 3.10. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 11/7/2022. (DMD) |
Filing 8 ENDORSED ORDER: Counsel are directed to meet and confer, in person or by telephone, and by October 31, 2022, file a completed Case Management Report. The Court believes that six to eight months is a sufficient period of time to conduct discovery in the vast majority of cases. If the parties believe that more than eight months will be needed to complete discovery, the parties should provide the Court with a detailed explanation as to why additional time is needed and a timeline for the discovery that is planned. After the Case Management Report is filed, the Court will determine whether a Case Management Hearing is necessary before entry of a Case Management and Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 10/17/2022. (DMD) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Anthony Smith. (Lopardo, Che) |
Filing 6 NOTICE by ZEP, Inc. Designation of E-mail Addresses (Blain, Christopher) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Blain on behalf of ZEP, Inc. (Blain, Christopher) |
Filing 4 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by ZEP, Inc.(Blain, Christopher) Modified on 10/7/2022 (CTR). |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to ZEP, Inc. (CTR) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington and Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. New case number: 8:22-cv-2150-VMC-AAS. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Anthony Smith with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-20002644) filed by Anthony Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Lopardo, Che) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Smith v. ZEP, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Anthony Smith | |
Represented By: | Che Lopardo |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: ZEP, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Christopher Blain |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.