Smith v. ZEP, Inc.
Plaintiff: Anthony Smith
Defendant: ZEP, Inc.
Case Number: 8:2022cv02150
Filed: September 15, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Virginia M Hernandez Covington
Referring Judge: Amanda Arnold Sansone
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2022 Filing 11 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE filed by Anthony Smith. (Lopardo, Che)
November 9, 2022 Filing 10 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Lopardo, Che)
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ENDORSED ORDER: On October 17, 2022, the Court directed the parties to meet and confer, in person or by telephone, and by October 31, 2022, file a completed Case Management Report. That date has passed, yet no Case Management Report has been filed. Accordingly, Plaintiff is directed to show cause by November 9, 2022, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Local Rule 3.10. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 11/7/2022. (DMD)
October 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ENDORSED ORDER: Counsel are directed to meet and confer, in person or by telephone, and by October 31, 2022, file a completed Case Management Report. The Court believes that six to eight months is a sufficient period of time to conduct discovery in the vast majority of cases. If the parties believe that more than eight months will be needed to complete discovery, the parties should provide the Court with a detailed explanation as to why additional time is needed and a timeline for the discovery that is planned. After the Case Management Report is filed, the Court will determine whether a Case Management Hearing is necessary before entry of a Case Management and Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 10/17/2022. (DMD)
October 12, 2022 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Anthony Smith. (Lopardo, Che)
October 7, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE by ZEP, Inc. Designation of E-mail Addresses (Blain, Christopher)
October 7, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Blain on behalf of ZEP, Inc. (Blain, Christopher)
October 7, 2022 Filing 4 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by ZEP, Inc.(Blain, Christopher) Modified on 10/7/2022 (CTR).
September 16, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to ZEP, Inc. (CTR)
September 16, 2022 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington and Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. New case number: 8:22-cv-2150-VMC-AAS. (SJB)
September 16, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Anthony Smith with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-20002644) filed by Anthony Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Lopardo, Che)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. ZEP, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Smith
Represented By: Che Lopardo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ZEP, Inc.
Represented By: Christopher Blain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?