GS Holistic, LLC v. Skgonagandla LLC et al
Plaintiff: GS Holistic, LLC
Defendant: Skgonagandla LLC doing business as 54th Smoke Lounge and Suresh K. Gonagandla
Case Number: 8:2022cv02184
Filed: September 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Charlene Edwards Honeywell
Referring Judge: Christopher P Tuite
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ENDORSED ORDER denying as moot #9 Plaintiff's Motion to Substitute Counsel, which the Court construes as a motion to withdraw as counsel as to attorneys Jamie Alan Sasson and Michael J. McCormick, Jr. It does not appear that either Mr. Sasson or Mr. McCormick filed a "pleading, motion, or other paper" as required under the Local Rules to make an appearance in this matter. See M.D. R. 2.02(b)(1) ("A lawyer's pleading, motion, or other paper serves as that lawyer's appearance in an action."). Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite on 11/3/2022. (ACL)
November 1, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION to Substitute Attorney by GS Holistic, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order on Motion to Substitute Counsel)(Penalta, Gabrielle) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite.
September 29, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by GS Holistic, LLC. Related case(s): No (Penalta, Gabrielle)
September 22, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS)
September 22, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS)
September 21, 2022 Filing 5 Trademark Report sent to Alexandria, VA. (MCB)
September 21, 2022 Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Suresh K. Gonagandla, Skgonagandla LLC. (MCB)
September 21, 2022 Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell and Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:22-cv-2184-CEH-CPT. (SJB)
September 21, 2022 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by GS Holistic, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Chris Folkerts for GS Holistic, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Corporate Disclosure Statement)(Penalta, Gabrielle) Modified text on 9/21/2022 (MCB).
September 21, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-20020088) filed by GS Holistic, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons)(Penalta, Gabrielle) Modified text on 9/21/2022 (MCB).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GS Holistic, LLC v. Skgonagandla LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GS Holistic, LLC
Represented By: Gabrielle Alexa Penalta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Skgonagandla LLC doing business as 54th Smoke Lounge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Suresh K. Gonagandla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?