Gibson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Polk County)
| Joshua Gibson |
| Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida |
| 8:2022cv02197 |
| September 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| William F Jung |
| Anthony E Porcelli |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER dismissing case without prejudice and directing the Clerk to close the case in accordance with the attached order. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 11/9/2022. (CCB)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER to file proof of indigency. The clerk must send to Gibson the required form for filing a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Not later than THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2022, Gibson either must submit the $5.00 filing fee or must complete and file the enclosed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Proof of indigency or $5.00 filing fee due by 11/3/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli on 10/4/2022. (LV)
|
|
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 9/23/2022. (KME)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Joshua Gibson. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Mailing Envelope) No IFP. (KME) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
