iGel Beauty LLC v. Daily Nail Art Supply, LLC
| iGel Beauty LLC |
| Daily Nail Art Supply, LLC |
| 8:2022cv02206 |
| September 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sean P Flynn |
| Kathryn Kimball Mizelle |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ENDORSED ORDER: Plaintiff has filed a #10 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. Because no defendant has filed an answer or motion for summary judgment, this notice is self-executing. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i); Matthews v. Gaither, 902 F.2d 877, 880 (11th Cir. 1990) ("The dismissal [under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i)] is effective immediately upon the filing of a written notice of dismissal, and no subsequent court order is required."). The Clerk is directed to terminate any deadlines and pending motions and to close this case. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 10/25/2022. (MEV)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of voluntary dismissal by iGel Beauty LLC. (Flanagan, Patricia) |
| Filing 9 RETURN of service executed on 10/6/2022 by iGel Beauty LLC as to Daily Nail Art Supply, LLC. (LNR) |
| Filing 8 PROOF of service by iGel Beauty LLC. (Flanagan, Patricia) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #3 Standing Order by iGel Beauty LLC. (Flanagan, Patricia) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by iGel Beauty LLC. Related case(s): No (Flanagan, Patricia) |
| Filing 5 Patent Report sent to Alexandria, VA. (Attachments: #1 Copy of Complaint) (LNR) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Daily Nail Art Supply, LLC. (LNR) |
|
Filing 3
CIVIL CASE STANDING ORDER: The parties shall meet and file a Case Management Report using the attached form within forty days after any defendant appears. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 9/26/2022. (MEV)
|
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle and Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn. New case number: 8:22-cv-2206-KKM-SPF. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Daily Nail Art Supply, LLC with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-20031661) filed by iGel Beauty LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Plaintiff's U.S. Design Patent No. D914,291 S entitled "NAIL LAMP", #2 Exhibit B. Plaintiff's Cease and Desist Letter to Defendant dated August 29, 2022, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Proposed Summons)(Flanagan, Patricia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: iGel Beauty LLC v. Daily Nail Art Supply, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: iGel Beauty LLC | |
| Represented By: | Patricia M Flanagan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Daily Nail Art Supply, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
