Shelley v. City of Sarasota
Ivey Shelley |
City of Sarasota |
8:2022cv02220 |
September 26, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Mary S Scriven |
Thomas G Wilson |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Job Discrimination (Race) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, or to file a First Amended Complaint in lieu of responding to the Motion to Dismiss by Ivey Shelley. (Hill, Brandon) |
Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by City of Sarasota. (Cronan, Candace) |
Filing 13 RETURN of service executed on October 10, 2022 by Ivey Shelley as to City of Sarasota. (Hill, Brandon) |
Filing 12 ENDORSED ORDER GRANTING #11 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant shall have up to and including November 7, 2022 to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 10/31/2022. (EOJ) |
Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Complaint by City of Sarasota. (Cronan, Candace) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Candace D. Cronan on behalf of City of Sarasota (Cronan, Candace) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Ivey Shelley. (Hill, Brandon) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Ivey Shelley. Related case(s): Yes (Hill, Brandon) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Local Rule 2.02(a), which requires designation of one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action. File a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation to identify lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (AG) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS issued as to City of Sarasota. (AG) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Africa Altidor on behalf of Ivey Shelley (Altidor, Africa) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Brandon J. Hill on behalf of Ivey Shelley. Lead Counsel: Brandon J. Hill. (Hill, Brandon) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER regarding discovery motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson on 10/3/2022. (ABC) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Mary S. Scriven and Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. New case number: 8:22-cv-2220-MSS-TGW. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Sarasota with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-20037228) filed by Ivey Shelley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Hill, Brandon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Shelley v. City of Sarasota | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ivey Shelley | |
Represented By: | Brandon J. Hill |
Represented By: | Africa Altidor |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: City of Sarasota | |
Represented By: | Candace D. Cronan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.