Prepared Food Photos, Inc. v. Packers' Plus Foods, Inc.
Plaintiff: Prepared Food Photos, Inc. and Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc.
Defendant: Packers' Plus Foods, Inc.
Case Number: 8:2022cv02443
Filed: October 26, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Charlene Edwards Honeywell
Referring Judge: Anthony E Porcelli
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDERED: This case is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and deadlines and CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 11/17/2022. (JDE)
November 17, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of voluntary dismissal by Prepared Food Photos, Inc. (DeSouza, Daniel)
November 8, 2022 Filing 9 RETURN of service executed on 11/05/2022 by Prepared Food Photos, Inc. as to Packers' Plus Foods, Inc.. (DeSouza, Daniel)
November 1, 2022 Filing 8 SUMMONS issued as to Packers' Plus Foods, Inc. (CTR)
October 27, 2022 Filing 7 Copyright Report sent to Washington. (Attachments: #1 Complaint and Exhibits) (CTR)
October 26, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS)
October 26, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS)
October 26, 2022 Filing 4 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:22-cv-2443-CEH-AEP. (SJB)
October 26, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Daniel DeSouza on behalf of Prepared Food Photos, Inc. Lead Counsel: Daniel DeSouza, Esq. (DeSouza, Daniel) Modified on 10/27/2022 (CTR).
October 26, 2022 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Prepared Food Photos, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate Lauren Hausman, Esq., Other Affiliate CopyCatLegal PLLC, Other Affiliate James D'Loughy, Esq., Other Affiliate Daniel DeSouza, Esq. for Prepared Food Photos, Inc. (DeSouza, Daniel) Modified on 10/27/2022 (CTR).
October 26, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Packers' Plus Foods, Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-20132997) filed by Prepared Food Photos, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Proposed Summons)(DeSouza, Daniel) Modified on 10/27/2022 (CTR).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Prepared Food Photos, Inc. v. Packers' Plus Foods, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Prepared Food Photos, Inc.
Represented By: Daniel DeSouza
Represented By: James D'Loughy
Represented By: Lauren M Hausman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc.
Represented By: Daniel DeSouza
Represented By: James D'Loughy
Represented By: Lauren M Hausman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Packers' Plus Foods, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?