Doe v. City of Lakeland, Florida et al
Jane Doe and Charmaine Saunders |
William Mutz, City of Lakeland, Florida, Lakeland Police Department, Bill, Ruben Garcia and Christina Stewart |
8:2022cv02482 |
November 1, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Mary S Scriven |
Julie S Sneed |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint by All Defendants. (Trohn, Jonathan) |
Filing 14 CORPORATE disclosure statement by Charmaine Saunders. (AG) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Charmaine Saunders. Related case(s): Yes. (AG) |
Filing 12 ORDER denying #10 Motion for Entry of Clerk's Default. Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed on December 14, 2022. (DD) |
Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT of Charmaine Saunders in support of #10 MOTION for Clerk's Default against City of Lakeland, Florida, Ruben Garcia, Lakeland Police Department, William Mutz, Christina Stewart by Charmaine Saunders. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Entry of Default)(AG) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Clerk's Default against City of Lakeland, Florida, Ruben Garcia, Lakeland Police Department, William Mutz, Christina Stewart by Charmaine Saunders. (AG) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. |
Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against City of Lakeland, Florida, Ruben Garcia, Lakeland Police Department, William Mutz, Christina Stewart filed by Charmaine Saunders. Related document: #1 Complaint, filed by Charmaine Saunders.(AG) |
Filing 8 ENDORSED ORDER GRANTING #6 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Initial Complaint. The Court notes that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15, Plaintiff may amend once as a matter of course within twenty-one (21) days of serving it or within twenty-one (21) days after service of a responsive pleading or a motion under Rule 12(b), (3), or (f). Plaintiff has filed returns of service indicating that Defendants were served on November 21, 2022. Thus, Plaintiff is entitled to amend without leave of court pursuant to the Rule on or before December 12, 2022. Nevertheless, as the deadline nears and in light of Plaintiff's pro se status, the Court grants the request and directs Plaintiff to file and serve an Amended Complaint on or before January 9, 2023. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 12/12/2022. (APF) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Barnet Trohn on behalf of Ruben Garcia, Lakeland Police Department, William Mutz, Christina Stewart (Trohn, Jonathan) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint, by Jane Doe. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum In Support)(AG) |
Filing 5 RETURN of service executed on 11/21/22 filed by Jane Doe as to City of Lakeland, Florida, Ruben Garcia, Lakeland Police Department, William Mutz, Christina Stewart. (SJW) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to City of Lakeland, Florida, Ruben Garcia, Lakeland Police Department, William Mutz, Christina Stewart. (LSS) |
Filing 3 ORDER STRIKING sealed document. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 11/9/2022. (APF) |
Filing 2 Entered in error (LSS). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Lakeland, Florida, Ruben Garcia, Lakeland Police Department, William Mutz, Christina Stewart with Jury Demand Filing fee $402.00, receipt number TPA67477 filed by Jane Doe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(KME) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.