Burnett v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al
| Jonathan Burnett |
| Equifax Information Services LLC and GTE Federal Credit Union |
| Gregory P. Holder |
| 8:2022cv02517 |
| November 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Virginia M Hernandez Covington |
| Anthony E Porcelli |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ENDORSED ORDER: On the basis of the Notice of Settlement (Doc. #13), this cause is hereby dismissed, without prejudice and subject to the right of the parties, within 60 days of the date hereof, to submit a stipulated form of final order or judgment, or request an extension of time, should they so choose or for any party to move to reopen the action, upon good cause being shown. After that 60 day period, however, without further order, this dismissal shall be deemed with prejudice. Furthermore, the Court advises the parties that "good cause" exists to reopen an action when a settlement agreement has yet to be finalized because of various delays. But incomplete performance of an executed settlement agreement, such as the failure to disburse settlement funds, does not constitute good cause to reopen an action. This Court does not retain jurisdiction to ensure performance of a settlement agreement because such failure to perform should be addressed in a separate breach of contract action. The Clerk is directed to terminate any previously scheduled deadlines and thereafter close this case. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 11/29/2022. (DRG)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of settlement - pending as to all Defendants by Jonathan Burnett (Bellinder, Thomas) |
|
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER: The parties are directed to adhere to the Court's Scheduling Order. This action is hereby referred to Gregory P. Holder, Esq., for mediation. The parties must mediate no later than March 21, 2023. Lead Counsel shall file a notice of mediation informing the Court as to the date, time, and location of mediation by December 5, 2022. Neither party may reschedule or cancel the mediation conference once it is set; leave of Court must be obtained before the mediation conference may be rescheduled or cancelled. The parties shall not mediate until the information exchange outlined in the Scheduling Order is completed. Absent compelling circumstances and leave of Court, lead counsel must appear at the mediation conference. Lead Counsel shall file a notice informing the Court as to the results of mediation within 24 hours of the mediation conference. In the event mediation results in an impasse, the parties must file their jointly-prepared fast-track case management report within 24 hours of the mediation conference. Upon review of the jointly-prepared case management report, the Court will determine whether a case management hearing is necessary. If a case management hearing is necessitated, the Court will set the hearing by separate notice. Furthermore, if mediation results in an impasse, the Court intends to schedule this action for trial within 90-120 days from the mediation conference. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 11/28/2022. (TWL)
|
|
Filing 11
ENDORSED ORDER granting in part Construed Motion for Extension of Time. (Doc. #10). Defendant GTE Federal Credit Union's answer is now due November 29, 2022. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 11/10/2022. (DRG)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Stipulated Between Plaintiff, Jonathan Burnett, and Defendant GTE Federal Credit Union by GTE Federal Credit Union. (Denzer, Andrew) |
| Filing 9 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by GTE Federal Credit Union. (Denzer, Andrew) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew L. Denzer on behalf of GTE Federal Credit Union (Denzer, Andrew) |
|
Filing 7
ENDORSED ORDER granting in part Motion for Extension of Time. (Doc. #3). Defendant's answer is now due November 29, 2022. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 11/9/2022. (DRG)
|
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Equifax Information Services LLC identifying Corporate Parent Equifax Inc. for Equifax Information Services LLC. (Joffe, Jason) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Equifax Information Services LLC. Related case(s): No (Joffe, Jason) |
| Filing 4 ***TERMINATED-COUNSEL NOTIFIED TO RE-FILE THE CORRECT DOCUMENT***CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Equifax Information Services LLC identifying Corporate Parent Equifax Inc. for Equifax Information Services LLC. (Joffe, Jason) Modified on 11/9/2022 (CTR). |
| Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal by Equifax Information Services LLC. (Joffe, Jason) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:22-cv-2517-VMC-AEP. (LMW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from County Court, Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, Hillsborough County, FL, case number 22-CC-045443 filed in State Court on June 27, 2022. Filing fee $402, receipt number AFLMDC-20166602 filed by Equifax Information Services LLC. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents Exhibit B - State Court Documents, #4 Exhibit C - Notice of Consent to Removal, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Joffe, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
