CreeLED, Inc v. Unknown Individual(s), Partnership(s), and/or Unincorporated Association(s)
CreeLED, Inc and CreeLED, Inc. |
Unknown Individual(s), Partnership(s), and/or Unincorporated Association(s) |
8:2022cv02590 |
November 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Virginia M Hernandez Covington |
Christopher P Tuite |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 5 NOTICE of voluntary dismissal by CreeLED, Inc. (Weaver, Arthur) |
Filing 4 Trademark Report sent to Alexandria, VA. (KME) |
Filing 3 NOTICE to counsel Arthur Robert Weaver, Richard Guerra of Local Rule 2.02(a), which requires designation of one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action. File a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation to identify lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (KME) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington and Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:22-cv-2590-VMC-CPT. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Unknown Individual(s), Partnership(s), and/or Unincorporated Association(s) (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-20190389) filed by CreeLED, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Weaver, Arthur) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.