Getz et al v. Braden et al
| Lara Getz and Stephan Getz |
| Jeanne Braden, Lloyd Braden and Gill Dawg, Inc. |
| 8:2022cv02636 |
| November 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Anthony E Porcelli |
| Mary S Scriven |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Walsh, Nicole) |
| Filing 13 Amended ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint by Gill Dawg, Inc..(Walsh, Nicole) |
Filing 12
ENDORSED ORDER granting in part and denying in part #6 MOTION to Dismiss portions of complaint and Motion to Strike by Gill Dawg, Inc. The demand for attorney's fees is stricken on stipulation. The Motion to Strike or Dismiss the claims for loss of filial consortium is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE at the motion to dismiss stage of the litigation. Defendants shall answer the complaint within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 12/14/2022.(Scriven, Mary)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Dismiss portions of complaint and Motion to Strike filed by Lara Getz, Stephan Getz. (Matthews, Marc) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Marc Matthews on behalf of Lara Getz, Stephan Getz. Lead Counsel: Marc Matthews. (Matthews, Marc) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Jeanne Braden, Lloyd Braden. (Haskins, Stephen) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen H. Haskins on behalf of Jeanne Braden, Lloyd Braden (Haskins, Stephen) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Gill Dawg, Inc.. (Walsh, Nicole) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss portions of complaint and Motion to Strike by Gill Dawg, Inc.. (Walsh, Nicole) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE to counsel Marisaa H. Cuffe Local Rule 2.01(c), Special Admission of Non-Resident Lawyer - File a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Co-counsel with filing rights may electronically file the motion on behalf of the non-resident lawyer or the motion may be filed on paper; Pay the Special Admission Fee; Submit a Pro Hac Vice E-File Registration through PACER. Visit www.flmd.uscourts.gov/for-lawyers for details (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (KME) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE Plaintiff counsel of Local Rule 2.02(a), which requires designation of one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action. File a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation to identify lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (KME) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Christopher Shawn Branton on behalf of Gill Dawg, Inc.. Lead Counsel: Christopher S. Branton. (Branton, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Mary S. Scriven and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:22-cv-2636-MSS-AEP. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 6th Judicial Circuit In and For Pasco County, Florida, case number 2022-CA-002631 filed in State Court on October 10, 2022. Filing fee $402, receipt number AFLMDC-20209045 filed by Gill Dawg, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court ANSWER, #3 State Court ANSWER, #4 State Court Docket Sheet, #5 State Court Other Documents, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Walsh, Nicole) Modified text on 11/18/2022 (KME). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
