Werthamer v. Trinity Technology Group, Inc.
Stacey Werthamer |
Trinity Technology Group, Inc.., and Trinity Technology Group, Inc. |
8:2023cv00927 |
April 27, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
James S Moody |
Christopher P Tuite |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Ortiz, Kelsey) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Trinity Technology Group, Inc. Related case(s): Yes (Kennedy, Kristyne) |
Filing 13 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Trinity Technology Group, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent KR Contracting, Inc. for Trinity Technology Group, Inc. (Ortiz, Kelsey) |
Filing 12 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint by Trinity Technology Group, Inc. (Kennedy, Kristyne) |
Filing 11 RETURN of service executed on 05/04/2023 by Stacey Werthamer as to Trinity Technology Group, Inc.. (Storch, Noah) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS issued as to Trinity Technology Group, Inc. (LNR) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Andres Kroboth on behalf of Stacey Werthamer. (Kroboth, Andres) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Stacey Werthamer. (Storch, Noah) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Noah E. Storch on behalf of Stacey Werthamer. Lead Counsel: Noah E. Storch. (Storch, Noah) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Stacey Werthamer. Related case(s): No (Storch, Noah) |
Filing 5 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Stacey Werthamer. (Storch, Noah) |
Filing 4 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (SMB) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement. Counsel must make their disclosures using the standard court form. The Disclosure Statement form can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. (SMB) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:23-cv-927-JSM-CPT. (AET) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Trinity Technology Group, Inc., with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-20774692) filed by Stacey Werthamer. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Storch, Noah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.