Perez-Mendez et al v. Cardinale
| Keila Perez-Mendez and Jonathan Reyes-Menendez |
| Director Nieves Cardinale and Nieves Cardinale |
| 8:2023cv00971 |
| May 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
| Mac R McCoy |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER dismissing case, without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and deadlines and CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 6/16/2023. (BGS)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of voluntary dismissal by Keila Perez-Mendez, Jonathan Reyes-Menendez (Prada, Mark) |
| Filing 10 PROOF of service by Keila Perez-Mendez, Jonathan Reyes-Menendez (Prada, Mark) |
| Filing 9 PROOF of service by Keila Perez-Mendez, Jonathan Reyes-Menendez (Prada, Mark) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS returned executed by Keila Perez-Mendez, Jonathan Reyes-Menendez. Nieves Cardinale served on 5/8/2023, answer due 7/7/2023. (Prada, Mark) |
| Filing 7 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Keila Perez-Mendez, Jonathan Reyes-Menendez. (Prada, Mark) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of a related action (none) per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Keila Perez-Mendez, Jonathan Reyes-Menendez. Related case(s): No (Prada, Mark) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement. Counsel must make their disclosures using the standard court form. The Disclosure Statement form can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Attorney General, United States Attorney's Office. (SET) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell and Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy. New case number: 8:23-cv-971-CEH-MRC. (AET) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nieves Cardinale (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-20795775) filed by Keila Perez-Mendez, Jonathan Reyes-Menendez. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons)(Prada, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
