Alday v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC et al
| Hubert Alday |
| Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, Swift Transportation Services, LLC, Wal-Mart Transportation, LLC, Elijah Santiago and Swift Leasing Co., LLC |
| 8:2023cv01122 |
| May 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sean P Flynn |
| Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition re #13 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Elijah Santiago, Swift Leasing Co., LLC, Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, Swift Transportation Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Response to PL's MTR, #2 ExhibitB - Response to PL's MTR, #3 Exhibit C - Response to PL's MTR, #4 Exhibit D - Response to PL's MTR)(Stover, Heather) Modified on 6/23/2023 (CTR). |
| Filing 15 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC.(Stover, Heather) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Elijah Santiago.(Stover, Heather) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Hubert Alday. (Fratello, Frank) |
| Filing 12 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Elijah Santiago, Swift Leasing Co., LLC, Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, Swift Transportation Services, LLC. (Stover, Heather) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Heather Lorraine Stover on behalf of Elijah Santiago, Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, Swift Transportation Services, LLC (Stover, Heather) |
Filing 10
ENDORSED ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Defendants' response due on or before 6/23/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn on 6/6/2023. (CED)
|
| Filing 9 SUPPLEMENT to Local Rule 3.01(g) Certification Regarding the Motion for Extension of Time to File Response Pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint by Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, Swift Transportation Services, LLC. (Stover, Heather) Modified on 6/5/2023 (CTR). |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint by Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, Swift Transportation Services, LLC. (Stover, Heather) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn. |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, Swift Transportation Services, LLC. Related case(s): No (Stover, Heather) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance of Lead Counsel Appearance by Heather Lorraine Stover on behalf of Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, Swift Transportation Services, LLC (Stover, Heather) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Heather Lorraine Stover of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (CTR) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement. Counsel must make their disclosures using the standard court form. The Disclosure Statement form can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell and Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn. New case number: 8:23-cv-1122-CEH-SPF. (RPB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Tenth Judicial Circuit, Polk County, case number 23-CA-2662 filed in State Court on 3/21/2023. Filing fee $402, receipt number AFLMDC-20862426 filed by Swift Transportation Services, LLC, Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5Exhibit A - Notice of Removal, #6 Exhibit B - Notice of Removal, #7 Exhibit C - Notice of Removal, #8 Exhibit D - Notice of Removal, #9 Exhibit E - Notice of Removal, #10 Exhibit F - Notice of Removal, #11 Exhibit G - Notice of Removal, #12 Exhibit H - Notice of Removal, #13 Exhibit I - Notice of Removal)(Stover, Heather) Modified on 5/24/2023 (CTR). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
