Bifulco v. Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) et al
Ashlynn Bifulco |
Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE), Department of Corrections and Naphcare |
8:2023cv01301 |
June 9, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
Amanda Arnold Sansone |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER dismissing case. 1. The complaint #1 is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. The dismissal is without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, in a new case with a new case number, that invokes a proper basis for this Court's subject matter jurisdiction. 2. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is DENIED as moot. 3. The Clerk is directed to: 1) send, along with a copy of this Order, these forms to Plaintiff: (a) Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights (Prisoner); (b) Affidavit of Indigency (2 copies); and (c) Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2241; and 2) close this case. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 6/30/2023. (BGS) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Ashlynn Bifulco. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(CTR) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Department of Corrections, Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE), Naphcare filed by Ashlynn Bifulco. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(CTR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.