Diorio v. Blinken et al
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Diorio
Defendant: Anthony Blinken and Michael Ratney
Case Number: 8:2023cv01879
Filed: August 19, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Anthony E Porcelli
Referring Judge: Mary S Scriven
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 5, 2023 Filing 9 SUMMONS returned executed by Jacqueline Diorio. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of Service, US Attorney General, #2 Exhibit Proof of Service, Office of the US Attorney)(Stoller, David)
September 5, 2023 Filing 8 RETURN of service executed on 08/30/2023 by Jacqueline Diorio as to Michael Ratney. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons Ambassador Ratney (Served), #2 Exhibit Proof of Service, Ambassador Ratney)(Stoller, David)
September 5, 2023 Filing 7 RETURN of service executed on 08/30/2023 by Jacqueline Diorio as to Anthony Blinken. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons Blinken (Served), #2 Exhibit Proof of Service, Blinken)(Stoller, David)
August 22, 2023 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Jacqueline Diorio. (Stoller, David)
August 22, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Jacqueline Diorio. Related case(s): Yes (Stoller, David)
August 22, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by David Stoller on behalf of Jacqueline Diorio. Lead Counsel: David Stoller. (Stoller, David)
August 21, 2023 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Anthony Blinken, Michael Ratney. (BD)
August 21, 2023 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Mary S. Scriven and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:23-cv-01879-MSS-AEP. (JG)
August 19, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-21167496) filed by Jacqueline Diorio. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit NVC Acknowledgement of Receipt, Form I-129F, #2 Exhibit Emails Correspondence from USCON Scheduling Interview, #3 Exhibit Case Status Inquiries Indicating Administrative Processing, #4 Exhibit Email Correspondence Indicating Completion of Administrative Processing, #5 Exhibit Additional Case Status Inquiries Indicating Administrative Processing, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Proposed Summons, Blinken, #8 Proposes Summons, Ratney)(Stoller, David) Modified text on 8/21/2023 (BD).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Diorio v. Blinken et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Diorio
Represented By: David Stoller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anthony Blinken
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Ratney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?