Hart v. Auburndale Police Deparment et al
| Randy Hart |
| Auburndale Police Deparment, FNU Rudolph, FNU Avila, FNU Russell, FNU Brown and FNU Judd |
| 8:2023cv02024 |
| September 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Anthony E Porcelli |
| Mary S Scriven |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of change of address by Randy Hart (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Mailing Envelope)(LD) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to Amend re #1 Complaint by Randy Hart. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ABC) |
| Filing 3 SUPPLEMENT re #1 Complaint by Randy Hart.( filed in this case per Order DE 2 in case 8:23-cv-2133) (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(RLK) |
Filing 2
ORDER dismissing Hart's #1 federal civil rights complaint for failure to state a claim. No later than 30 DAYS from the date of this Order, Hart must file an amended complaint on the standard form and must either pay the filing fee or allege specific facts demonstrating an imminent danger of serious physical injury. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enclose with this Order the standard form for a federal civil rights complaint. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 9/13/2023. (JT)
|
| Filing 1 EMERGENCY COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Randy Hart. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Mailing Envelope)(LD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
