Riley v. Steiner et al
| Tawon D. Riley |
| Frank Steiner, State of Florida and Authorized Reps |
| 8:2023cv02053 |
| September 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Thomas P Barber |
| Steven D Merryday |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of change of address by Tawon D. Riley (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(CTR) |
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) re #1 Complaint filed by Tawon D. Riley for failing to state a claim on which relief can be granted. The clerk must CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 9/21/2023. (RO)
|
| Filing 3 Case Reassigned to Judge Steven D. Merryday. New case number: 8:23-cv-2053-SDM-UAM. Judge Thomas P. Barber no longer assigned to the case. (KE) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER transferring this case to the Honorable Steven D. Merryday with his consent and for all further proceedings. See Riley v. Steiner, et al., Case No. 8:23-cv-1947-SDM-UAM (M.D.Fla.). Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 9/18/2023. (SRC)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Authorized Reps, State of Florida, Frank Steiner filed by Tawon D. Riley. No IFP.(KME) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/13/2023: #1 Exhibit, #2 Mailing Envelope) (KME). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
