Williams v. American Family Mutual Insurance
| Brittany Williams |
| American Family Mutual Insurance |
| 8:2023cv02097 |
| September 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Steven D Merryday |
| Anthony E Porcelli |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER of USCA as to #5 Notice of Appeal filed by Brittany Williams. Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Brittany Williams has failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court within the time fixed by the rules. EOD: 11/09/2023; USCA number: 23-13370-J. (KE)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER denying #4 "Motion to Pay Continued;" denying #6 Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis. An appeal lacks good faith. Williams is assessed the $505 appellate filing fee, which she must pay without installments unless the circuit court allows her to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 10/23/2023. (RO)
|
| Filing 7 TRANSMITTAL of initial appeal package to USCA consisting of copies of notice of appeal, docket sheet, order/judgment being appealed, and motion, if applicable to USCA re #5 Notice of Appeal. (MCB) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appeal In Forma Pauperis by Brittany Williams. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(MCB) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #3 Order on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, by Brittany Williams. Filing fee not paid. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(MCB) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically Pay Continued by Brittany Williams. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(MCB) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER denying #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED under the "three-strike" provision in Section 1915(g). This dismissal is without prejudice to Williams filing a new action with both a new case number and the payment of the $402.00 filing fee. The clerk must CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 9/21/2023. (RO)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Brittany Williams. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(MCB) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against American Family Mutual Insurance filed by Brittany Williams. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(MCB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Williams v. American Family Mutual Insurance | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Brittany Williams | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: American Family Mutual Insurance | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
