Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. CIRSCO, Commercial Industrial Roof Services Company
| Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London |
| CIRSCO, Commercial Industrial Roof Services Company |
| 8:2023cv02149 |
| September 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Kathryn Kimball Mizelle |
| Julie S Sneed |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 AMENDED COMPLAINT against CIRSCO, Commercial Industrial Roof Services Company filed by Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London.(Shadowitz, Mitchell) |
| Filing 19 ***Counsel notified to refile using correct event code*** AMENDED document by Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London. Amended Complaint. (Shadowitz, Mitchell) Modified text on 11/16/2023 (MCB). |
Filing 18
ENDORSED ORDER granting #17 Motion to Amend. Plaintiff must file an amended complaint by November 17, 2023, and Defendant must respond to that amended complaint within fourteen days of filing. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3). Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 11/14/2023. (ZG)
|
| Filing 17 First MOTION to Amend by Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit proposed Amended Complaint)(Shadowitz, Mitchell) |
|
Filing 16
ENDORSED ORDER: On November 2, 2023, Plaintiff #11 moved for default judgment. Because Plaintiff has not yet moved for and been granted an entry of default, however, default judgment is inappropriate. See Local Rule 1.10; Fed. R. Civ. P. 55. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion is denied without prejudice. Defendant's #14 motion to dismiss is also denied without prejudice, as the motion is untimely and Defendant has not moved to extend its deadline to respond to the complaint under Rule 6. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(B) (requiring a motion and a showing of excusable neglect). Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 11/3/2023. (ZG)
|
| Filing 15 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 MOTION for Default Judgment against CIRSCO, Commercial Industrial Roof Services Company filed by CIRSCO, Commercial Industrial Roof Services Company. (McCommon, Steven) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by CIRSCO, Commercial Industrial Roof Services Company. (McCommon, Steven) |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Standing Order by CIRSCO, Commercial Industrial Roof Services Company. (McCommon, Steven) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by CIRSCO, Commercial Industrial Roof Services Company. Related case(s): No (McCommon, Steven) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Default Judgment against CIRSCO, Commercial Industrial Roof Services Company by Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London. (Shadowitz, Mitchell) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Standing Order, 8 Order by Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London. (Shadowitz, Mitchell) |
|
Filing 9
ENDORSED ORDER: Although Plaintiff served Defendant on September 28, 2023, See Return of Service Executed (Doc. 5), Defendant appears to have failed to timely answer Plaintiff's complaint, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A)(i). Accordingly, Plaintiff must move for a default as to Defendant no later than November 17, 2023. See Local Rule 1.10(b). Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 10/20/2023. (ZG)
|
|
Filing 8
ENDORSED ORDER: As required by Local Rule 3.03, Plaintiff must file a Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying parties and interested corporations in which any assigned judge may be a shareholder, as well as for other matters that might require consideration of recusal. Plaintiff must file the foregoing by using the template attached to (Doc. #4) (also available on the undersigned's website under the "forms" tab). Plaintiff must file the Disclosure Statement and Certification no later than October 25, 2023. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 10/20/2023. (ZG)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven Richard McCommon on behalf of CIRSCO, Commercial Industrial Roof Services Company (McCommon, Steven) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London. Related case(s): No (Shadowitz, Mitchell) |
| Filing 5 RETURN of service executed on 9/28/2023 by Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London as to CIRSCO, Commercial Industrial Roof Services Company. (Shadowitz, Mitchell) Modified text on 9/29/2023 (MCB). |
|
Filing 4
CIVIL CASE STANDING ORDER. The Parties shall meet and file a Case Management Report using the standard form on the Court's website within forty days after any Defendant appears. Each Party must also file a Corporate Disclosure Statement using the standard template attached to this Order (also available on the undersigned's website under the "forms" tab) within fourteen days after appearing. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 9/25/2023. (ZG)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to CIRSCO, Commercial Industrial Roof Services Company. (MCB) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle and Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. New case number: 8:23-cv-2149-KKM-JSS. (RLK) Modified to edit docket text on 9/26/2023 (RLK). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CIRSCO, Commercial Industrial Roof Services Company (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-21283336) filed by Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Shadowitz, Mitchell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. CIRSCO, Commercial Industrial Roof Services Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London | |
| Represented By: | Mitchell L. Shadowitz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CIRSCO, Commercial Industrial Roof Services Company | |
| Represented By: | Steven Richard McCommon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
