Jain et al v. Nexgen Memantine, Inc.
| Jitendra Jain, Manish Arora, Scariya Scariya Kumaramangalam, Harsh Datta and Balvant Arora |
| Nexgen Memantine, Inc. |
| Gajan Mahendiran |
| 8:2023cv02157 |
| September 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Virginia M Hernandez Covington |
| Julie S Sneed |
| Other Fraud |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 0077 Securities Fraud |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #9 MOTION for Default Judgment against Nexgen Memantine, Inc. , #8 Notice of a Related Action filed by Balvant Arora, Manish Arora, Harsh Datta, Jitendra Jain, Scariya Scariya Kumaramangalam. (Southron, Joseph) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #9 MOTION for Default Judgment against Nexgen Memantine, Inc. , #8 Notice of a Related Action by Gajan Mahendiran. (Elgidely, Robert) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE by Balvant Arora, Manish Arora, Harsh Datta, Jitendra Jain, Scariya Scariya Kumaramangalam of filing Status Report (Southron, Joseph) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Default Judgment against Nexgen Memantine, Inc. by Jitendra Jain, Manish Arora, Scariya Scariya Kumaramangalam, Harsh Datta, Balvant Arora. (Southron, Joseph) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Balvant Arora, Manish Arora, Harsh Datta, Jitendra Jain, Scariya Scariya Kumaramangalam. Related case(s): Yes (Southron, Joseph) |
Filing 7
ENDORSED ORDER: Plaintiffs are directed to file a status report on the status of this case by October 23, 2023. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 10/16/2023. (DMD)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.03, which requires each party to file a disclosure statement. Counsel must make their disclosures using the standard court form. The Disclosure Statement form can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (MEJ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), which requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (MEJ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (MEJ) |
|
Filing 3
ENDORSED ORDER: The Court is aware of the notice entered in this case, explaining that Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the filing of a uniform case management report with forty or seventy days, depending on the circumstances of the case. However, under Local Rule 1.01(b), a judge can modify or suspend for all or part of an action the application of any rule, except Rule 1.05(a). This Court finds it beneficial to enter a fast-track scheduling order in certain categories of cases before entry of a case management and scheduling order. Additionally, in cases that are not fast-tracked, this Court finds it efficient to have the parties confer and file case management reports within 14 days after the defendant's responsive pleading is due or within 14 days after a case is removed to this Court. In light of this, the Court hereby suspends Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) in this case. At a time the Court deems appropriate, the Court will enter a further order in this case setting either a deadline to file a completed uniform case management report or various fast-track deadlines for the case. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 9/26/2023. (MEJ)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (MEJ) |
| Filing 1 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Verification by Balvant Arora, #2 Affidavit Verification by Manish Arora, #3 Affidavit Verification by Harsh Datta, #4 Affidavit Verification by Scariya Kumaramangalam, #5 Affidavit Verification by Jitendra Jain, #6 Exhibit A, #7 Exhibit B, #8 Exhibit C, #9 Exhibit D, #10 Exhibit E, #11 Exhibit F, #12 Exhibit G, #13 Exhibit H, #14 Exhibit I, #15 Exhibit J, #16 Exhibit K, #17 Exhibit L, #18 Exhibit M, #19 Exhibit N, #20 Exhibit O)(HAI) Modified text on 9/26/2023 (GL). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
