Evans v. Rozas et al
| Rickey Lamar Evans, Jr. |
| Marrissa K. Rozas, Ashely G Allen, Jeffrey V. Catlin, G. Gordon, Michael S. Borba, Caitlin M. Ridgeway, Christian D. Stephens, Terry L. Tapp and Devin S. Wooden |
| 8:2023cv02365 |
| October 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Charlene Edwards-Honeywell |
| Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
| Christopher P Tuite |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDERED: The Clerk is directed to (1) terminate the motion at docket entry #3; and (2) open a new civil action and docket the motion (Doc.# 3) as a petition for the writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241 and docket a copy of this Order. Signed by Senior District Judge Charlene Edwards-Honeywell on 12/15/2023. (JDE)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Writ Habeas Corpus by Rickey Lamar Evans, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(MCB) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of inquiry of Case Status by Rickey Lamar Evans, Jr. Clerk responded with courtesy copy of docket sheet. (MCB) **No mailing envelope provided* |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ashely G Allen, Michael S. Borba, Jeffrey V. Catlin, G. Gordon, Caitlin M. Ridgeway, Marrissa K. Rozas, Christian D. Stephens, Terry L. Tapp, Devin S. Wooden filed by Rickey Lamar Evans, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(CTR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
