Reed v. Citizens Telecom Services Company, LLC
| Daniel N Reed and Daniel N. Reed |
| CITIZENS TELECOM SERVICES COMPANY L.L.C. and Citizens Telecom Services Company, LLC doing business as Frontier Communications |
| 8:2023cv02400 |
| October 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Thomas P Barber |
| Thomas G Wilson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 623 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Nancy A. Johnson of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (ELM) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 5 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule by Citizens Telecom Services Company, LLC. (Holden, West) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint by Citizens Telecom Services Company, LLC.(Holden, West) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SRC) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement. Counsel must make their disclosures using the standard court form. The Disclosure Statement form can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SRC) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Citizens Telecom Services Company, LLC. (BD) |
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER regarding Discovery Motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson on 10/23/2023. (KMN)
|
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Thomas P. Barber and Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. New case number: 8:23-cv-2400-TPB-TGW. (ARC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Daniel N. Reed against CITIZENS TELECOM SERVICES COMPANY L.L.C. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-21380996) filed by Daniel N Reed. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Complaint Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Complaint Exhibit B, #4 Notice of Related Cases, #5 Certificate of Interested Parties, #6 Proposed Summons)(Levine, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
