Vazquez-Padilla v. Cognizant Technology Solutions US Corporation
| Zuania Vazquez-Padilla |
| Cognizant Technology Solutions US Corporation |
| 8:2023cv02607 |
| November 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Thomas P Barber |
| Christopher P Tuite |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ENDORSED ORDER: "Defendant's Unopposed Time-Sensitive Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint" (Doc. #11) is granted. Defendant may file its response to the complaint on or before January 22, 2024. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 1/12/2024. (EKB)
|
| Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint (Time-Sensitive) by Cognizant Technology Solutions US Corporation. (Simmons, Tori) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Cognizant Technology Solutions US Corporation. Related case(s): Yes (Simmons, Tori) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Cognizant Technology Solutions US Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation, Corporate Parent Cognizant Domestic Holdings Corporation for Cognizant Technology Solutions US Corporation. (Simmons, Tori) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Tori Simmons on behalf of Cognizant Technology Solutions US Corporation. Lead Counsel: Tori C. Simmons. (Simmons, Tori) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER of service returned executed on Nov. 21, 2023 by Zuania Vazquez-Padilla as to Cognizant Technology Solutions US Corporation. (Lechner, Jay) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SRC) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SRC) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Zuania Vazquez-Padilla. (Lechner, Jay) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Zuania Vazquez-Padilla. Related case(s): Yes (Lechner, Jay) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Thomas P. Barber and Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:23-cv-02607-TPB-CPT. (TRF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cognizant Technology Solutions US Corporation with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-21462799) filed by Zuania Vazquez-Padilla. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lechner, Jay) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
