Ice Rak, LLC v. Rita's Franchise Company, LLC
Plaintiff: ICE RAK, LLC
Defendant: RITA'S FRANCHISE COMPANY, LLC
Case Number: 8:2023cv02659
Filed: November 20, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: William F Jung
Referring Judge: Thomas G Wilson
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ENDORSED ORDER: Rita's must file a Reply to Doc. 14 within 14 days. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 1/11/2024. (Jung, William)
January 11, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ENDORSED ORDER denying #13 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 1/11/2024. (Jung, William)
January 2, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 14 RESPONSE to Motion re #8 MOTION to Stay re #1 Complaint Pending Arbitration filed by Ice Rak, LLC. (Muniz Marcial, Alejandra)
December 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MOTION for Default Judgment against Rita's Franchise Company, LLC by Ice Rak, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Muniz Marcial, Alejandra)
December 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Ice Rak, LLC. (Muniz Marcial, Alejandra)
December 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SUPPLEMENT re #8 MOTION to Stay re #1 Complaint Pending Arbitration Rule 3.01(g) Certification by Rita's Franchise Company, LLC. (Burden, Christian)
December 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Rita's Franchise Company, LLC identifying Corporate Parent RWI FRanchise Corp., Corporate Parent RWIFC Holdings, LLC for Rita's Franchise Company, LLC.. (Burden, Christian)
December 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Rita's Franchise Company, LLC. Related case(s): Yes (Burden, Christian)
December 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION to Stay re #1 Complaint Pending Arbitration by Rita's Franchise Company, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I)(Burden, Christian) Modified on 12/19/2023 (CTR).
November 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 COUNSEL NOTIFIED TO REFILE USING CORRECT CASE EVENT -- PROOF of service by Ice Rak, LLC (Muniz Marcial, Alejandra) Modified text on 11/29/2023 (JK).
November 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (JCG)
November 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement. Counsel must make their disclosures using the standard court form. The Disclosure Statement form can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (JCG)
November 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING ORDER regarding Discovery Motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson on 11/21/2023. (KMN)
November 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Rita's Franchise Company, LLC. (JDR)
November 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge William F. Jung and Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. New case number: 8:23-cv-02659-WFJ-TGW. (AM)
November 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rita's Franchise Company, LLC (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-21483859) filed by Ice Rak, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Proposed Summons)(Muniz Marcial, Alejandra) Modified on 11/21/2023 to edit docket text (JDR).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ice Rak, LLC v. Rita's Franchise Company, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ICE RAK, LLC
Represented By: Alejandra Muniz Marcial
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RITA'S FRANCHISE COMPANY, LLC
Represented By: Christian C. Burden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?